March 16, 2009

“Seal Woman”

This is going to be a quick post that I’ll add to later, as I’m late for a meeting (cue me going “AAAACK!” like Andy Samberg imitating the Cathy comic on Saturday Night Live).

Our Book of the Week is truly wonderful. Seal Woman by Solveig Eggerz from Ghost Road Press is the story of a young German woman whose World War II circumstances force her to start a new life. She answers an ad in the newspaper from Iceland, and winds up as the second wife of a man whose hard, lonely existence as a farmer is softened only by the presence of “the old woman,” who may or may not be his mother.

Eggerz, an Icelander whose knowledge of Germany comes from several years in which she lived in that country, has crafted a dreamy yet stark portrait of a human’s transition from one world to another. I truly engaged with this book and with Charlotte, and I believe many readers of this site will, too. 

We’ve got ten copies of Seal Woman to give away to ten random winners from the first 30 who post and tell us about the toughest transition you’ve ever made. Was it from single person to spouse? From student to master? Unpublished writer to published author? Perhaps from woman to mother? Whatever your own transformation was, tell us below — and perhaps you’ll receive your own copy of Eggerz’s novel. Thanks, as always, for reading and commenting!

Email This Post

31 Comments

January 9, 2009

Page to Screen: “The Reader”

Today’s video is of WETA’s “Around Town” critic Jane Horwitz reviewing “The Reader,” a recently released film starring Kate Winslet as a German woman whose past is definitely prologue. Horowitz loved Winslet’s performance, but took issue with one of the movie’s main points: that one woman’s struggle with stories led to her job as a death-camp guard.

The interesting thing here is not with Horwitz’s interpretation of the adaptation, but once again, with the adaptation’s interpretation of the novel. I generally try to steer clear of spoilers, but I think in this case that most people probably know from reviews what Hannah’s secret it, and I also think that the “secret” doesn’t make the story — the power of The Reader as a novel lies in how that secret is understood. With that…

SPOILER ALERT: Hannah is illiterate. The novel’s protagonist and movie’s main character is a a 15-year-old boy who reads to the middle-aged Hannah during a brief affair, then learns of her Nazi past while he is in law school, and finally encounters her again, tragically, when he has reached middle age (he’s grown into Ralph Fiennes! Why can’t that happen to all the lawyers?).

To Horwitz, the adaptation tries to excuse Hannah’s willingness to work as a guard with her attempts to hide her secret. Full disclosure: I have not seen the movie. However, I have read the novel, which is very powerful and does not give that message. On perusing the book’s B&N.com Editorial Reviews page, I found the following snippet of a New York Times interview with Bernhard Schlink:

NYT: Is Hanna’s illiteracy a metaphor implying that Germans perpetrated the Holocaust simply out of ignorance?
Schlink: I know education doesn’t protect against committing crimes. It’s much easier for an intellectual to come up with a legend to delude others, or themselves. Hanna in her illiteracy stands naked in her wrongdoing.
The New York Times, March 30, 1999

That’s a lot different from the message Horwitz heard in the movie. I don’t doubt that she heard it, either. My point is not that books shouldn’t be adapted to film, or that these filmmakers messed up (someone else can argue those points somewhere else). My point (and I do have one) is that in Hollywood’s rush to find new material, I think producers and screenwriters have forgotten something essential about fine art. It’s not a simple matter to adapt it.

What I mean is, the original, especially if nuanced and complex (as fine art usually is), will not be just multilayered — it will be downright slippery. That’s what makes adaptation an art in itself and, like all art, it sometimes triumphs on one level (a compelling performance, such as Winslet’s) and fails utterly on another.

Last month, in my post about “Benjamin Button,” I asked about your least-favorite adaptation. This week, my question is: Are you more, or less, likely to go and see a movie based on a book you know?

Email This Post

5 Comments

Posted by Bethanne in Literary Fiction, New media

trackback | permalink

January 2, 2009

What Are You Reading in 2009?

Happy New Year, everyone! I hope you had wonderful and safe celebrations…ours, at a friend’s house, featured a magnum of very good Champagne that lasted a mysteriously short period of time shared between 20051001_0098 by Derek Holthamsix people. (Next year, we’ll have to invest in at least two, or perhaps a  jeroboam…)

I have a New Year’s Day tradition, begun ages ago, of watching “Blackadder” episodes while moving very little. Yesterday I continued this hallowed ritual, sharing it with my mother, who is laid up with a very bad back. I carted the Mini Mavens with me over to my sister’s house and while they read, slept, and played with their younger cousin, my mom was introduced to the glory of Rowan Atkinson’s rubberfaced antics and a very young Hugh Laurie’s foppish splendor as the Prince of Wales (nothing like the Laurie of “House” atall atall.)

Anysleepyafternoonhow, after yesterday’s videofest, today I’m jonesing for new reading material. I do have a few early 2009 releases to recommend to you, before I ask for your recommendations. Here they are:

Entertaining Disasters: A Novel (With Recipes) by Nancy Spiller (Counterpoint): Pay no attention to the Publishers Weekly review that says this is “a static character study of a whining foodie.” It’s a lot more than that, and if Spiller never quite reaches the heights of meaning, it’s because her reach exceeds her grasp — and that’s far better than most of the genre muck on bookstore shelves. Don’t read this one too quickly. It needs patience, so you’ll understand why many of the recipes are bizarre and “unexecutable,” according to PW. There are reasons for that. I look forward to Spiller’s next book.

The School of Essential Ingredients by Erica Baumeister (Penguin): Baumeister is another debut novelist who also happens to be a slow-food aficionado, and she imbues this lovely, Maeve Binchy-esque book with slow-won wisdom. Each chapter is built around an individual’s story and a single ingredient, but all of the characters are attending a remarkable cooking class at a restaurant called Lillian’s (the chef/teacher is the eponymous owner). Think Binchy’s “Scarlet Feather” crossed with Kate Jacobsen’s “The Friday Night Knitting Club.” Perfect book for a cold January evening, preferably with some artisanal hot chocolate close by.

In the Shadow of the Master: Classic Tales by Edgar Allan Poe and Essays by Jeffery Deaver, Nelson DeMille, Tess Gerritsen, Sue Grafton, Stephen King, … Lisa Scottoline, and Thirteen Others edited by Michael Connelly (William Morrow): I know that one year’s end In/Out list said using periods for emphasis it “OUT,” but then, I’m never really in, so about this book let me say: Just. So. Good. Get it! Read it! Re-read “The Masque of the Red Death.” I defy anyone to find a modern story that’s as evocative and creepy all at once.

What are YOU reading that’s new for 2009? Or looking forward to reading in 2009, new or not?

Email This Post

7 Comments

December 3, 2008

Book of the Week: “Train to Trieste”

Welcome back from the Thanksgiving holiday, everyone! I hope you had lots of time to read something good. We’ve got a new book to give away — and a wonderful new author video right on its heels.

I hope you’ll take a few minutes and watch my interview with Domnica Radulescu, whose debut novel, Train to Trieste, came out this fall. It’s the story of a girl name Mona who longs to escape the drudgery of life in Ceaucescu’s Romania, but whose dreams aren’t realized in quite the way she’d imagined they would be once she emigrates to the United States.

If you’d like to nab one of ten copies of Domnica Radulescu’s Train to Trieste, tell me in a comment on this post (following our giveaway deadlines, please) which author you’d most like to see interviewed on this site in 2009.

Email This Post

30 Comments

November 26, 2008

Talking with Julia Glass

JuliaGlass by grubstreetincJulia Glass reads her reviews. When I ask her what she thought about Liesl Schillinger’s comment that Glass’s new book I See You Everywhere is a “literary clafoutis,” the author says “We took that as kind of a slap, since clafoutis is comfort food, a kind of mix – but then I realized that The New York Times really respects me to have reviewed my third book, and I kept reading. Overall it was a very positive review.”

Glass continues. “Some of the most interesting reviews have revealed things to me about myself as a writer. It can be marvelous to see how an intelligent readers ‘reads’ you in ways that surprise you. For example, one man who came to a reading talked to me about the way I use secrets, and I’d never seen that in my own work. But I believe that ‘the reader is always right;’ if they’re smart, it’s probably there.”

Right readers are why Glass “so enjoys” going out on the road and answering questions. “A high-school student asked me how I tackle the problem of writing silence,” she says. “That’s a great question, and it made me think hard about that the next time I sat down to write.”

She believes that some problems can be tackled, while others get worked on subconsciously. “For the longest time, I didn’t know why I’d created the character of Saga in The Whole World Over, but now I do: I created her because I had to have a foil for Greenie Duquette’s husband Allen. He’s so mind- and intellect-focused; she has to live more in the present, because of her brain injury. I wanted to look at the way our relationship to memory changes as we grow older, how we get to the point where we realize more is behind us than ahead of us.”

Glass and I chat for a few minutes about how when we lose people and they therefore exist only in our memories, memories take on a different value. This is particularly relevant to I See You Everywhere, which is about sisters Louisa and Clem Jardine and the loss that changes their relationship forever. “When you have a sibling,” says Glass, “You’re thrown together, quite possibly for life, with someone who is more genetically like you than anybody else in the world. There is no way you can ever sever that relationship, even if you don’t talk for decades.”

Siblings, she says, are “potentially your greatest soulmate or ally, but the truth is that person is also set up to be your greatest rival and competitor in life. It’s such a paradox!” As some readers already know, Glass had a troubled relationship with her own sister, who committed suicide. “A lot of hidden truths are exposed between siblings,” she says. “Even though we were not best friends, in times of extreme crisis, we’d call each other. It’s a subtle wish to speak to the person who will tell you the hardest truths about yourself.”

I ask Glass if that might be why neither sister struck me as particularly likable. “People who know each other well in times of crisis aren’t always kind to each other. They’ve got each other’s number. These are like a slide show of the sisters’ most vulnerable moments.”

Slideshow…not a movie…that’s an interesting choice of words. Glass laughs. “Well, you’ll notice that nowhere on the jacket does it say ‘novel.’ This book in my mind is a collection of closely interlinked stories; in fact, some of them were written before Three Junes.” She says that sitting down with stories she hadn’t looked at in over a decade was both “appalling and gratifying.” “I could see how much my writing had improved, but I still wasn’t sure how to structure the book. I didn’t want o write a memoir, because if this book were a memoir it would have to be about solving the death, and that’s not what I wanted to do. In a way, it should have been my first book – but I’m glad it wasn’t.”

Glass believes that this tale of “heartbreak that’s incurable” will make readers feel “compelled, even if uncomfortably, to follow this story. It features deeply flawed, disagreeable characters who have to win you over – and those are my favorites. Fiction at its best is a great conduit of empathy. If you come out on the side of the character? That’s a triumph. Fiction doesn’t cure, but it does help you endure. When I say the heartbreak of my sister’s death is incurable, I really mean it. You never heal. All the novels I have loved the most are abut human endurance. How do we go on, after folly, regret, heartbreak…that’s what interests me.”

Since I agree with Glass that fiction shows this better than any other art form, I ask her what she thinks about the current state of publishing, and the future of books. “Wow, got a couple of hours?” she says. “I think that I think a lot of authors are really passive and don’t understand how the publishing industry works. There’s a lot of trickledown, and the distributors are a little hard up;some of them have no stock, because they have limited budgets and they have to spend money on the frontlist. Most authors don’t realize that it’s not up to the publisher what the distributor stocks. I’m really trying to understand what goes on. Maybe the downturn means more people will be reading, but I’ve seen more coming to readings and fewer people buying.”

Glass says that she’d like to think that people will always be readers. “One thing that I’m seeing…there’s a lot of incredible sophisticated writing going on for young adults. For example, I just finished The Hunger Game by Suzanne Collins, and it was terrific. But unless we make libraries seriously kid-friendly places, I don’t think we’re going to raise readers – and if we don’t raise readers, well…”

Email This Post

8 Comments

November 25, 2008

“I See You Everywhere” by Julia Glass

Greetings, Author, Author readers! After a couple of “dark” weeks, we’ve got a T-Day treat for you: our next book giveaway.

There’s just a slight catch to this one: As usual, I’m going to ask you to leave a comment in order to qualify for a giveaway copy of Julia Glass’s new book but I’d like to ask if you might let me know if you prefer print interviews, or video interviews. Tomorrow’s Glass interview will be a print one.

Editor’s Note: Some kind of glitch caused part of this entry to disappear yesterday. Please leave your comments about print versus video interviews here on this post, and thanks!

Email This Post

4 Comments

November 2, 2008

Toni Morrison on NPR

I should have gotten this up last week, but: better late than never. This is very cool, and a great use of new media:

“Toni Morrison, Nobel Laureate and celebrated author of The Bluest Eye, Song of Solomon and the Pulitzer Prize-winning Beloved will unveil her highly anticipated new novel A Mercy (to be published by Alfred A. Knopf on November 11) on NPR.org’s Book Tour, www.NPR.org/books, in a series of pre-publication readings October 27-30. Morrison will read approximately 30 pages over the four-day Book Tour series and talk with NPR’s Lynn Neary about her latest novel. The interview and reading will be available as streaming audio, podcast or download on NPR.org.

Concurrent with the launch of Morrison’s NPR Book Tour serialization on October 27, Michele Norris, host of NPR’s award-winning afternoon news magazine All Things Considered, talks with Morrison about A Mercy in her first broadcast interview in connection with the novel. For the first time, Morrison discusses the letter she wrote to Senator Barack Obama last winter, her first endorsement of a presidential candidate. Portions of that conversation with Michele Norris will appear on NPR.org.

The NPR community will have an opportunity to discuss the book directly with Morrison the week of November 17 via a live chat on NPR.org.”

While you might have missed the launch last week, this is still well ahead of the book’s release, and gives any readers here ample time to participate in the November 17th chat, as well.

Email This Post

Submit a comment