(Full disclosure: I did this very thing for the first time back in 2004, for Stephen Covey in an AOL promotion, and believe me, out of the 300-plus questions I received, there were about 100 that sounded as if even KoKo the Gorilla, who once did an AOL Chat, could have put together more coherent queries. Please note that I am comparing KoKo to readers, NOT to the very articulate Mr. Covey.)
However, what truly fascinates me about some of these questions is the fact that someone bothered to ask them at all. Here are som examples:
Posted by Harry Matthew Morsely in LA:
..My question was for the AW&ST story on Jap defense on air-sea and land..It was sorry to hear that, Japan has still on the edge of war anytime soon..I hope Japan and others in Asia has long peace and long freedom and happy..What you say..??..Your Your Sheet..Bye..
Ummmm, OK, Mr. Morsely. Enjoy your vodka!
Then we have the succinct, and stupid:
Posted by tien bischoff in arizona:
ur gay right
No comment.
Then, the truly mystifying:
Posted by Sara Ivry in Brooklyn:
What brand of sneaker do you prefer to run in, and how often do you replace your running shoes?
Ah, I get it…Sara Ivry was trying to force a “run-in” with the author…GROAN.
But my favorite was this reader, who had several questions for Mr. Murakami, all somewhat puzzling:
Posted by Isaiah Lim in Singapore:
How would you own funeral be like?
Posted by Isaiah Lim in Singapore:
If you had children, how would you raise them?
Posted by Isaiah Lim in Singapore:
Why types of limitations are good?
Should we here at Author, Author! ever conduct an open-question interview, I think we’ll monitor the Comments section pretty carefully, LOL.
It’s too bad that, like Gawker, I can’t stop myself from paying attention to these useless questions first, because there were plenty of really interesting and astute questions, too. The reason I feel comfortable ignoring them is because the really good ones will make it to the final interview.
Just one more reason we still need oversight, folks. Web 2.0 (or whatever form 3.0 takes) may allow more voices to be heard, but when it comes to figuring out which voices actually have something to say? Ask an editor.

4 Comments