January 29, 2009

“We’re Not in This for Money:” The 1981 Internet Newspaper

Take heart, Washington Post Book World. While some editors there were still in elementary and high school, the Internets were already on the rise, threatening to take over the world of print. You could have done nothing to stop it.

                                            Please watch this video, if only to see the sincerity on the face of the San Francisco Examiner dude when he says “We’re not in this for money.” Haaaaahaha, Hee, hee, hee. Ahhhhhh… Oh, those days of innocence! 

However, given the demise of print book reviews sections and the quotes about their demise being driven by lack of advertising, maybe we’re all really not in this for money. Hmmm, things are getting interesting. 

(Thanks, Gabe Goldberg!)

Email This Post

Submit a comment

Author Interview

Q & A with Susan McCorkindale

If you aren’t energized after watching this video…

Susan McCorkindale is one of those writers whose voice comes through as clearly in her writing as it does when she’s giving an interview. If you enjoy listening to her, you’ll enjoy reading her book. I can testify to enjoying both!

Email This Post

9 Comments

Posted by Bethanne in Author Interviews

trackback | permalink

January 28, 2009

Washington Post Book World: No More Print Edition

It’s official.

More shortly.

Here’s an update from The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz.

Readers, what do you think about this change? Will you read Book World in its entirety online?

Email This Post

5 Comments

Posted by Bethanne in New media, Publishing

trackback | permalink

January 27, 2009

Requiescat in Pace, John Updike

I’ll have more on this shortly, but: John Updike has died at the age of 76.

John Updike

I thought I’d add a few links to explain Updike’s influence on contemporary literature:

  • On Updike’s Wikipedia page, you can see his entire bibliography, which helps make clear that he was an accomplished poet and critic as well as novelist and short-story writer. (And yes, I know that Wikipedia is not a reliable source; don’t use it for research, but do at least see the breadth of Updike’s work there.)
  • The NYTimes page on Updike is a great way to contrast the man himself (interviews, essays) with the man as cultural figure (reviews, appreciations).
  • Washingtonpost.com ran the full Reuters obituary for Updike.

Email This Post

2 Comments

Posted by Bethanne in Uncategorized

trackback | permalink

January 26, 2009

Book of the Week

Book of the Week: “Confessions of a Counterfeit Farm Girl”

I’m late to the party with this blog; I meant to post earlier today, but I got caught up in another book which I’ll tell you about another time in deference to the madly delightful Susan McCorkindale, author of this week’s spotlight title. 

Anyway, you need to read Confessions of a Counterfeit Farm Girl, because it will make you laugh out loud, and after the eclipse we’ve all just endured, we need that. I need that. You need that. Susan McCorkindale is a Jersey girl who wound up at the pinnacle of magazine marketing in Manhattan before her husband “Hemingway” kidnapped the entire family (well, OK, not really kidnapped, but sorta…) to a rural Virginia farm/homestead where (to paraphrase my beloved Pioneer Woman) McCorkindale traded black heels for tractor wheels and spa treatments for, well, a lot of cow manure. 

And she loves it. I’ve met the woman in the flesh; she really, really loves it all and she is NOT lying about it. I would know; after all, I’ve watched the first episode of “Lie to Me.” No microexpressions on this woman’s face. Everything about Susan McCorkindale is macro!

You will love this book, and you will receive one of our ten giveaway copies if you write in and tell me what makes you a “counterfeit:” wife, mother, reader, accountant, volunteer, Olympian, whatevs (and yes, Mario Moccia, this is the perfect time for you to respond!). 

Email This Post

14 Comments

Posted by Bethanne in Book of the Week, Giveaways

trackback | permalink

January 23, 2009

What’s On Your Nightstand?

I started asking this question nearly five years ago. In the blogosphere, that’s roughly equivalent to a century. But I never get tired of hearing the answers. 

So what is on your nightstand? Is it one of the books you’ve snagged from an Author Author giveaway? The next book in a favorite series? A stack of never-read nonfiction books (I’m talking to you, Mr. Bethanne!)? Many avid readers keep several books going simultaneously, and theirs are the best nightstands (yours truly’s included, thankyouverymuch). 

Right now, I’m reading:

The Calling by Inger Ash Wolfe

When Will There Be Good News? by Kate Atkinson

When Christ and His Saints Slept by Sharon Kay Penman

Morality Tale by Sylvia Brownrigg

Hmmmmmm…I hadn’t realized before how closely these titles mirror my current mindset…

But enough about me. What’s on your nightstand? Can’t wait to see your answers!

 

Email This Post

5 Comments

Posted by Bethanne in Book stuff, Reading habits

trackback | permalink

January 22, 2009

Publishing: “A Financial Coelacanth”

Thank you, Lev Grossman, for that phrase from this article. I’ve been writing about publishing for a long time, now, and I’ve said many of these things before in print, in blogs, and in private. Maybe I’m a coelacanth, too. 

I know we all love paper books. They are warm to us and seem to be a respite from technology. I think it’s worth remembering that when they were first produced en masse, paper books must have seemed just as intimidatingly technological as e-readers and print-on-demand machines do today.

But the worst part about paper books is that they have allowed the publishing industry to cling too long to what Grossman correctly calls an “antique” business model based on unrealistic print runs and returns. 

What would you do if you could instantly change publishing? (I’d make sure author compensation worked well, but I’m a little biased…)

Email This Post

2 Comments

January 20, 2009

Book of the Week

“What Do We Do Now?”

Some of you are probably like me, right now: simultaneously watching the Inaugural proceedings on while surfing the net for more news about them. So I understand if no one gets over here today. The books will keep!

I mixed things up a little this week because of this. I wanted as may people as possible to read my interview with Stephen Hess about his new book, What Do We Do Now? A Workbook for the President-Elect (Brookings). 

(Oooo, you’ll have to be patient with me for a moment. I’m watching the Obamas enter the White House for coffee with the Bushes. Michelle Obama brought them a gift — don’t you wish you knew what it was?)

We’ve got ten copies of What Do We Do Now? to give away to the first ten readers who respond with what President-Elect (very, very soon to be President) Obama might do to support literacy and/or the arts during his time in office. (After the economy, natch.)

 

Email This Post

13 Comments

January 19, 2009

Author Interview

Stephen Hess, “What Do We Do Now? A Workbook for the President-Elect”

This week Stephen Hess, Senior Fellow Emeritus in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution and Distinguished Research Professor of Media and Public Affairs at George Washington University (whew!) took some time to talk with me about his nineteenth book – which is, it is fair to say, quite a departure from Organizing the Presidency. This one is lighter in tone and topic: What Do We Do Now? A Workbook for the President-Elect (Brookings Institution Press, January 2009).

But while Hess’s new book may be lighter in tone and topic, it’s quite serious in its intent. Stephen Hess has been employed by, involved with, and an observer of presidential administrations since the Eisenhower administration (he began there as a speechwriter while still a twentysomething). He knows what happens during good presidential transitions and bad, and he’s got the stories to prove it. 

I asked Hess first why he chose to call this a “workbook” and not a “handbook.” He said “I started with a handbook in mind, but then it became kind of a literary conceit in my own mind. I thought, if I call this a ‘workbook’ I can throw in all of these exercises.” The exercises range from the straightforward (“What promises did you make?”) to the fun (“Pick a Presidential Portrait”).

The inauguration is just days away when I speak to Hess, so I asked him if he thought the “PEOTUS” (President-Elect of the United States) is ready. “There’s a lot of loose ends,” said Hess. “Suddenly he still has one cabinet appointment to make. However, this president has really found remarkable people and made very creative choices for his cabinet.”

Hess told me that the book had its beginnings last year when he thought about the upcoming election: “I realized that I had been involved, in one way or another, in every election/inaugration/transition since the late 1950s, and I started to draft my first chapter, ‘My Life in Transition’ so that readers could understand why I was writing the book. “

Of course, says Hess, “Coming in is more fun than going out, I can assure you!” His “Checklist for the President-Elect” reads like the elaborate timetable for the greatest event-planning situation ever – and that might not be too far off the mark. Obama has “beat my markers,” says Hess. “Clinton, for example, had one of the truly awful transitions – that may be good for Obama, since John Podesta has had 16 years of experience  to realize and analyze what went wrong and what to do differently this time.”

Hess believes that a key to a successful transition is “creating a plan to balance efficiency and creativity with work habits.” Does he think that Obama’s gym-rat habits will withstand the transition? He laughs, but admits that “Right now Obama has to be laser-like about the economy while there are lots of other things trying to force themselves onto his agenda. I think this is what happened to some extent with Bill Clinton. He was a very smart, very creative president who just kept moving around between all of the things that interested him and got truly sidetracked along the way. We shall see if that happens with Barack Obama. Our expectations are that it won’t.”

One of the reasons Hess wanted to set out all of these transition guidelines is that “It’s almost inconceivable, but conceive it: Presidents know so little about how government is really run, that after one of them has made a decision, he hardly knows what happens to it or why it doesn’t come out as he expected. The intereaction between the executive branch and the people who really run things – the high-level civil servatns – can be tainted with a lot of misunderstanding and suspicion, but it doesn’t have to be. I think President-Elect Obama is off on the right foot because he’s got a lot of people who are still relatively young coming back in, people who have great ideas, but experience, too.”

There are some goofs that can be made during presidential inaugurations (Hess says “Look at William Henry Harrison, who spoke for two hours in the freezing cold, got sick, and died a month into office – you can’t beat that in terms of idiocy”), but Hess doesn’t think that anything will upstage Barack Obama’s inaugural address. “Read Dreams from My Father. It’s a great book. It’s clear we are about to have a president who is our most literary stylist since Lincoln.”

Tomorrow: An Giveaway in Honor of the Inauguration

Email This Post

2 Comments

January 16, 2009

Novel Idea: Survival of the Bookish

Via this morning’s Jezebel comes a post based on this New Scientist article. Scientists analyzed the results of a questionnaire about 200 nineteenth-century novels and found that the good-guy/bad-guy dynamic in nearly all of them closely mirrored the values of a hunter-gatherer society, in which heroes emphasize the good of the group and villains are out for themselves alone. The scientists thus concluded that the purpose of novels may be evolutionary.

Evolutionary, but hardly revolutionary: Weren’t there any literary scholars available to talk to these scientists about the role of storytelling throughout human history? Oh, wait: They “believe novels have the same effect as the cautionary tales told in older societies. ‘Just as hunter-gatherers talk of cheating and bullying as a way of staying keyed to the goal that the bad guys must not win, novels key us to the same issues…They have a function that continues to contribute to the quality and structure of group life.’”

Does this mean that those of us who listen to stories and take in their lessons are more likely to evolve and survive? If you ask me, this is an argument for strengthening reading as an activity. I don’t think I want today’s video-game fanatics to be the “group life” that evolves and survives from contemporary storytelling. 

There’s also quite an interesting corollary in here about reading-as-solitary-activity versus storytelling-as-group-activity. The most bookish among us (present company definitely included) tend to read alone, and the authors of these value-reinforcing novels tend to write alone. Could it be that the novels are meant less to help the group — and more to help the individual understand and become part of that group? And what about (as Anna discussed over at Jezebel) the subversive ideas in these novels? What about Heathcliff?

What do you think? 

 

Email This Post

5 Comments

Next Page »