Friday, 1.30.09, 6:00 am
February in Music
Is girlish violinist Nicola Benedetti worth attending a concert with the program unknown? I know Julia Fischer (absolutely nothing girly about her, despite Decca’s best/worst marketing efforts), performing later in the month, would be. In case of curiosity, Benedetti plays on February 3rd (7.30PM) at the Kennedy Center Terrace Theater. If she gets more famous than she already is, you might not have the chance to hear her again in such a suitable, modestly sized venue, which I think is one of the attractions of the recital and makes me mention it here. Organized by WPAS.
Let’s enjoy Fischer Iván while we have him around on a regular basis, and from February 5th through the 7th (7PM on Thursday, 8PM on Friday and Saturday) he’ll lead the NSO in music he is most familiar with. Bartók’s ever splendid Concerto for Orchestra and Dvořák’s much underrated (compared to the overplayed 9th, at any rate) Seventh Symphony which should be particularly enjoyable. Stylistic home field advantage does count for something, after all. On Sunday, Fischer will host a talk about the works at 6PM at the Terrace Theater.
The Cypress String Quartet will play Birthday Boy Mendelssohn’s String Quartet in A minor, op. 13 coupled with Beethoven’s op.135 and a world premiere by Kevin Puts’, written as a “response” to these two masterpieces. I’ve found that modern works that take their cue from classics and/or are composed to fit specifically into such a program tend to be the most successful, at least for the moment of live performance. Part of the free concerts at the Library of Congress, there is every reason to give it a try on February 6th (8PM). Those without tickets (free through Ticketmaster) have a good chance of getting seats, anyway, if they come early.
If you like your 20th century classical music more contemporary than Martin, you will have to go Library of Congress that day. György Kurtág and his pianist-wife Márta will perform with the marvelous Keller Quartet (also from Hungary) at the Library of Congress. Selections from Kurtág’s wild and mischievous Játékok works will be given along with a World Premiere titled Hommage à Bartók and “Six moments musicaux Op.44”. The Keller Quartet tops it off with Bartók’s Fifth String Quartet. If you like the repertoire, this is almost mandatory, though getting a (free) ticket now might be difficult. February 7th (8PM), Library of Congress.
He’s already appeared in WPAS’s Hayes Piano Series (in May of 2006), now he’s back at the Terrace Theater as part of the Young Concert Artists Series: Wonny Song. I had found parts of his recital three years ago interesting (Musorgsky and Stephen Paulus), and Tim Page went further, finding it one of the best recitals that season. Now it should be interesting to hear how much he has grown and what he has to say in Bach, Schumann, Schubert, Debussy, and YCA Composer-in-Residence Andrew Norman’s commissioned work. Sunday, February 8th (2PM)
February 8th you might be pressed for choice: The Washington Bach Consort performs a whole slew of baroque composers’ chamber works at the Harman Center for the Arts (3PM), the Auryn Quartet will present early, middle, and late Beethoven (op.18/3, op.59/3, op.127) at the chamber-music paradise that is the Corcoran’s Francis and Armand Hammer Auditorium (4PM), and Radu Lupu also dedicates his recital to with Beethoven (Sonatas 8-10), followed by Schubert’s great b-flat minor sonata D960 at Shriver Hall in Baltimore (5.30PM).
More contemporary music at the Austrian Embassy with Georg Friedrich Haas, an Austrian “avant-garde impressionistic composer”, presented by In Vain, preceded by Kimmy Szeto’s arrangement of Schumann’s Scherzo and Adagio for Chamber Orchestra. The Argento Chamber Ensemble performs this free concert on Monday, February 9th (7.30PM).
Despite the anniversaries, no one seems to care about Haydn or Mendelssohn much: the Guarneri String Quartet plays Beethoven and Schubert (C-major Quintet, with founding cellist David Soyer) in their—presumably—last Washington performance. Terrace Theater, Tuesday February 10th (7.30PM).
The enchanting sounds of Orlando di Lasso and Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina can be experienced by the Hilliard Ensemble at the same venue on Thursday, February 12th (7.30PM).
The NSO will get Eschenbach as its new director, Philadelphia got Charles Dutoit as its new—if temporary—director, following Eschenbach’s departure. February 19th through 21st invite you to hear how he fares with his predecessor’s new band, when he presents a solid program of Ravel (Le Tombeau de Couperin), Stravinsky (complete Firebird), and Prokofiev (Piano Concerto No.2 with Yuja Wang). (7PM, 8PM, 8PM)
The long ongoing series of Musicians from Marlboro at the Freer Gallery of Art has contained many marvels and is worth checking out every time, especially since tickets are free. Haydn (Quartet), Brahms (Clarinet Quintet) and Kodaly (Duo for Violin and Cello) are on the menu. Tickets for the performance on Thursday, February 19th (7.30PM), can be gotten through Ticketmaster at (202) 397-7328, (410) 547-7328, or (703) 573-7328; or www.ticketmaster.com.
I’ve not yet heard the 18th Street Singers, but whether they’re excellent or just very good almost doesn’t matter when the work presented is Frank Martin’s Mass for Double Choir. Frank Martin is one of the most wonderful 20th century composers, having composed severe but loving, deeply felt and devout music. Saturday, February 20th (7.30PM) at the Embassy of Switzerland.
The concert of the Qatar Philharmonic Orchestra is interesting, almost despite itself. Lorin Maazel’s capabilities were never in question, but I never expect to be excited by his concerts, either. Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony doesn’t strike me as the most imaginative way of announcing: “Western classical music is great”, and the compositions by music director and resident composer Marcel Khalifé’s—“Arabian Concerto” and “Salute”—have all the ingredients necessary for cross-over kitsch. (You can find the premiere performance of it on YouTube from which it sounds like the soundtrack of a British documentary about Greater Arabia segueing into a Bolero-esque finale.) Why go? Well, for one, the brand new Qatar Philharmonic, backed by the will and money to turn it into a world class orchestra, has attracted some of the finest young orchestra musicians to join it and should be capable of very fine performances already. It’s now the primary exponent of Classical Music in Arab World, and a hugely important element in cultural diplomacy and cultural exchange. After Lorin Maazel’s foray into cultural diplomacy in Pyongyang, it’d be very interesting to see how he fares here. They’ll perform on Thursday, February 24th (7.30PM) at the Kennedy Center Opera House.
The alternative that same day is to hear Julia Fischer plug her new Bach album on Decca at Strathmore, accompanied by the Academy of St. Martin in the Fields. Also on the program will be Britten’s Variations on a Theme of Frank Bridge and the Walton Sonata for Strings (8PM).
There are those who say that the Philharmonia is the new exciting orchestra in London, now that Esa-Pekka Salonen has taken over, and those who find the London Philharmonic stirring because of Vladimir Jurowski. You have the chance to check out the latter on Thursday, February 26th (8PM), when Jurowski presents his band with the Mahler Adagio from Symphony No.10, Ligeti’s Atmosphères, and Strauss’ Also Sprach Zarathustra—joined by Leon Fleisher for Mozart’s Piano Concerto No. 23, K. 488. At the Music Center at Strathmore, 8PM, presented by WPAS.
From Thursday February 26th (7PM) through Saturday the 28th (Friday and Saturday at 8PM), the NSO will present Gil Shaham and yet another young Finnish conductor, Hannu Lintu. It’s difficulat to predict if the program, coupling the Stravinksy Violin Concerto with Weill’s Rise and Fall of the City of Mahagonny Suite, and orchestral extracts from Thomas Adès Powder her Face will be as successful as it is ambitious, but it looks like it ought to be given a chance. Adès (b.1971), the least well known name on the program, has impressed every time I’ve heard his work, and for everyone interested in getting to know his opera, this is a fine opportunity.
Thursday, 1.29.09, 6:00 am
Mozart’s Birthday in Salzburg
This week was Mozart’s Birthday, and what better way to celebrate than to spend a little time at the “MozartWoche” in Salzburg, one of the annual star-powered festivals in Salzburg.
Twenty three concerts in ten days, with artists Daniel Barenboim, Pierre Boulez, the Capuçon Bros., Dennis Russell Davies, Bernarda Fink, Martin Fröst, Christian Gerhaher, Susan Graham, Werner Güra, Magdalena Kožená, Marc Minkowski, Seiji Ozawa, Simon Rattle, András Schiff, Mitsuko Uchida, the Artemis-, Hagen-, and Minguet Quartets, Camerata Salzburg, Concentus Musikus Wien, Ensemble intercontemporain, Mahler Chamber Orchestra, Les Musiciens du Louvre, and the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra. And that’s just a selection.
I skipped the first three days and started with what was supposed to a chamber performance of the Capuçons, Fröst, Antoine Tamestit (ARD Viola Prize Winner), and Sergio Tiempo. Unfortunately Tiempo got sick and Renaud Capuçon elected to practice the Berg Violin Concerto (due today in Munich with the BRSO) instead, and the replacement pianist Mihaela Ursuleasa was more pale patch than surprising delight. Her distressingly trivial Haydn Sonata (Hob:XVI 49) is best kept mum about, her Mozart B-minor Adagio K540 was made unbearable by a superimposed profundity of the shallowest kind, and both of Beethoven’s sets of Variations for Cello and Piano wouldn’t have been transformative experiences, even if Gautier Capuçon had elected to play in the same pitch as the piano instead of putting on the artiste, closed eyes, dramatically raised eyebrows, and all.
The chamber music fared much better. Mozart’s Kegelstatt Trio in E-flat was the sole survivor of the original program (a tantalizing juxtaposition of just Birthday-Boy Mozart and Anniversary-Papa Haydn) and in this 2+1 trio, Föst and Tamestit gave an example of what musical communication in chamber music should be like. Brahms’ Clarinet Trio, a somewhat arbitrary filler, was appreciated for Fröst’s contribution who, even in a less than concentrated state, is incapable of unlovely music-making. He engages in the potentially distracting snake-charmer movements common to clarinetists, but closing one’s eyes confirms the consistent, unfettered and clear beauty of his tone.
The New Mozarteum is an impressive building, surprisingly aesthetic for its bulky size and rigorous modernist look. It contains a good sounding concert hall (“Solitaire”) with a spectacular view over the Mirabell Gardens over to the Mönchsberg. Waiting for Carolin Widmann, I hear sounds coming from the Solitaire upstairs that evoke a group of musicians testing the exact breaking point of a piano, cello, and violin. It turns out to have been Widmann & Co practicing Matthias Pintscher’s work “Svelto”. From the piano rooms in the back faint sounds of a student practicing the same Schumann phrase over and over round out the delicate cacophony.
I missed the performance of “Svelto” the next day, where it was part of an almost four hour long “Concert & Conversation”, juxtaposing Mozart with Pintscher. The idea of loosening up the ears with familiar sounds between the demanding complexities of modern works is great in theory. In practice, ensembles spend all their time practicing the new, difficult piece, and perform Mozart (or Haydn, or whatever else it may be) on autopilot. Mozart’s String Quartet in d-minor K421 suffered thus, with only the cellist attempting to bring calm and cohesion to the work, and then only for one movement.
Pintscher’s talk with Stephan Pauly about the world premiere of his “Study IV for Treatise on the Veil” for string quartet (inspired by Cy Twonbly’s painting of the same name) was full of empty phrases about “spatial relationships”, “states of density”, “duality and autonomy”: European feuilleton-speak of the worst kind, supported by projections of artworks by Giacometti, Beuys and of course Twombly. (The unintended comedic element of continuously pronouncing the work “Treatise on the Veal” was sadly lost on the rapt audience.) Strangely, some of those platitudes began taking on relevance during the half hour “Study IV”, and the fragile Giacometti sculptures received audial context.
The work comes across as a breathy study of sound, heavily muted sounds of a freight train station or under-water sea lion chatter, occasionally and violently punctuated by shrieks. The first violinist’s hitting the score in a few agitated moments could have been intentional or accident: with music like this, who knows. The score was, to the limited extend one could tell, performed superbly, delicately, and with enormous precision. It would have fit seamlessly into the exhibit of a modern art museum, which is part compliment, part warning: It’s aesthetically impressive art, but does being museum-bound make contemporary music instant taxidermist’s material, dead-on-arrival? Twenty minutes into “Study IV”, the first actual “string quartet sounds” appear, only to slip back into the atmospheric clatter. But the critical ear noted with surprise: The 30 minutes sounded like 15! “Study III for Treatise on the Veil” for violin solo—performed, fully engaged, by Carolin Widmann—followed, and it sounded like paper and stone—a bit like what might be left if a composition by Kaja Saariaho had all its music filtered out.
Mozart still didn’t get a particularly genial Birthday present in Alexander Lonquich’s Sonata in F, K533/494, but what a difference to the morning’s interpretation. Rather too bold and a little harsh, at least here was a concept and interpretive intent with which one could disagree, rather than no concept at all. The concert continued for another 90 minutes, with more Pintscher (said “Svelto” and “Janusgesicht for Viola and Cello”) and Mozart’s Quartet in E-flat, but I had to run—not from the music, but to my next appointment.
The evening set the first musical exclamation mark. René Jacobs, the Freiburg Baroque Orchestra, and the RIAS Chamber Choir presented Haydn’s Creation. A very homogeneous, wet sound (as if covered by several silken veils, down to the timpani), resulted in a warm and comfortable orchestral glow. Maximilian Schmitt, who had rid himself of the gray fuzziness that surrounded his voice for the first few minutes of the first and (after the break) third part, was surrounded by Johannes Weisser—strong and radiating—and strong yet mild, surprisingly dramatic soprano Julia Kleiter, whose comfortable voice has a brassy, matte golden hue, aided by spot-on accuracy. Dramatic also the smallish orchestra, which displayed the “roaring lions” with the most garish possible brass exclamation and made the floor boards creak at “Den Boden drückt der Tiere Last”. There was nothing chamber-like in the rousing, powerful contribution of the RIAS Chamber Choir. (An aside: Does anyone else hear hints of the First Act Finale of “L’Italiana in Algeri” in the music to “und ewig bleibt sein Ruhm”?)
Another treat, squeezed between a score of interviews, was experiencing Nicolaus Harnoncourt in rehearsal with the Vienna Philharmonic and the Arnold Schoenberg Choir, getting Haydn’s Harmoniemesse in B-flat ready for performance.
Fröst, meanwhile, got at it again on Tuesday, the 27th, when he played the Mozart Clarinet Concerto in A, K622 on the basset clarinet it was intended for. The sense that Fröst was not entirely at ease but encountered moments where he had to fight a little lent intensity to what might otherwise have been too sparkly and pretty a performance. The way he held the last note of the Adagio until it died away into infinity, just to jump immediately into the eagerly excited Rondo Allegro was just one of the touches that make his performances so special. He followed Mozart with Carter’s Clarinet Concerto after intermission, which had a more difficult stance with the audience. But with concentration and accuracy in ample supply by soloist and the Camerata Salzburg, the chamber qualities and violent whiplash of the work came through well.
It caught me by surprise, but most successful and remarkable was the conducting of Heinz Holliger. I thought of him as a instrumentalist and composer, known for his conducting primarily in modern repertoire. No revelation that his Carter was excellent. But how absolutely smudge-free the muscular neo-classicism of Ravel’s Le Tombeau de Couperin shone through French romanticism—full bodied and delicate—was truly special. And the concluding Military Symphony by Haydn was worthy of hyperbole. While its initial delightful, gentle sounds elicited a light chuckle of relief from the Carter-shocked audience, the violence and war indicated by the symphony’s title made their presence known just a few bars later. It turned out to be the most intensely theatrical reading, with the trumpets charging headlong into their music (just like the opening of Mahler’s Fifth), and the three man military percussion group marching into and through the auditorium in the finale. A gimmick, but delightful and impressive. Undoubtedly the best performance of this symphony I’ve ever heard—and well possibly the best live Haydn Symphony I’ve had the pleasure to hear. Haydn’s Symphony No.104 and Mozart’s Symphony in C, K338, aided and abetted by Christian Gerhaher in Mozart arias and Sándor Veress’ dark, brooding Elegie, were just about as fine.
Interviews and a few detailed reviews from Salzburg will follow.
Thursday, 1.15.09, 6:00 am
Two Saint Matthew Passions (Enoch zu Guttenberg)
On my “Easter Pilgrimage” last year, I heard Enoch zu Guttenberg’s Matthew Passion on the Munich leg of the tour. Guttenberg and his Neubeuern Choir are a local musical force, much loved and admired in the region. His pick-up band, which he coyly named “SoundAdministration Orchestra”, consists of members of the best European orchestras (Berlin Philharmonic, Concertgebouw, et al.) and local players—including soloists from the Munich Philharmonic and the Rosamunde String Quartet. Guttenberg’s performance of the Matthew Passion around Easter are an institution, known to be consistently individual, ‘unique’ interpretations. When I sat in the Philharmonic Hall on Good Friday to listen to what was my fourth Matthew Passion in six days, I spectacularly failed to get it.
Part of the problem: I listened lazily. I didn’t participate; I simply wanted to let the music do the work of enthralling me. A miscalculation, as it turned out, because as I did not bother with the text, the musical choices of Guttenberg ended up annoying me to no end. Unable or unwilling to put them in context, I found the interpretation awkward, the performance disappointed me, and that disappointment angered me.
A few weeks after Easter I was sent the Guttenberg 2003 recording (apparently just now issued or re-issued outside Germany by Farao). Knowing several expert ears to be very fond of Guttenberg’s very particular interpretation, I had the chance to give it another try, to give it its due time, respect, and engagement. That made all the difference.
Guttenberg’s version may well remain controversial to many listeners. Uninitiated listening might have it seem that when Guttenberg passes the chalice, he hands it over with a cup of crazy. But it isn’t that simple and it wouldn’t be doing the performance justice to declare it wilfully romantic or completely over the top. There is rhyme and reason to all he does. Not only that: as a musical interpretation of the gospel of St.Matthew it becomes one of the great Matthew Passion recordings there are.
Whatever Guttenberg does in the Matthew Passion, he does not do so out of a sense of license or sheer, unmotivated exuberance—but out of a sense of duty to the text and Bach, and the impression the Matthew Passion must presumably have made on the original audience. The cry “Barabas”, for example, is not a short punctuated staccato interruption, it is an extended, surprisingly slow and devastatingly disturbing cry that tears through the fabric of the music, analogous to the when the veil in the temple is torn as Jesus dies on the cross. The dissonant chord which, to our ears no longer so shriekingly dissonant, is played out so harrowingly that the dissonance is again audible.
The chorale “Wenn ich einmal soll scheiden” initially sounded dour to my ears—now I find it as touching as could be, because I hear in it the utter reluctance to part. The whiplash of the continuo string instruments and the frenzied violins in the recitative “Erbarm es Gott!” depicts the beating of Christ about as vividly as the Mel Gibson film.
The overly enunciated chorale “O Haupt voll Blut und Wunden” irritated me in the live performance. Musically, I’m still not particularly fond of the hacked-off stop-and-go performance the choir turns in. But realizing how this symbolizes the broken bones of Christ, how he has suffered, and suffers under his wounds does make it a truly, appropriately pitiful moment. If the interpretive device with which Guttenberg conveys that scene isn’t actually very pleasant, well… neither is the scene he depicts.
The coup of Guttenberg’s interpretation of the Matthew Passion is that he elevates—or rather: uncovers and restores—the climax of Matthew’s gospel as the highpoint of Bach’s work. It’s often missed because it is so short, but it’s unmissable in the story. It is at Matthew 27:54 and part 63b (NBA) in Bach, when at the end of the crucifixion scene, after the gruesome death of Jesus and the ensuing earthquake, the rough heathen Roman executioners and their captain (of all people!) are the first to grasp the meaning of what has happened before them. Their hearts change and they acknowledge (“Due chori in unisono”): “Truly… truly: this was the Son of God.” (Notably, it’s the only time Bach lets both choirs sing unisono.)
Two bars, not even 20 notes—but here elevated to the pinnacle of the whole work. Forty (!) seconds so intense, so heartfelt, so earnestly passionate, that absolutely without fail I tear up every time I hear it.
Guttenberg ’s Matthew Passion is a religious one. In the extensive interview included in the liner notes, he may admit to knowing no better than the next guy whether God exists or not, but declares his love for the gospel of Matthew and—this is crucial—how he puts the text of the gospel above the music. As a Bavarian (Upper Franconian) Catholic, emotionality is important to Guttenberg, and conveying the emotion of the gospel by whatever means (including HIP methods) is his sole goal. The result is an utterly baroque reading of BWV 244.
I like to imagine how a few Bach lovers who appreciate the work of Rifkin, McCreesh, or Junghänel roll their eyes at this, exclaiming how the last thing they need is a “baroque” reading of Bach… before becoming aware of the inherent absurdity of that sentiment.
But of course emotionality in the 21st century is different from Bach’s time, our ears perceive music differently, and the means to recreate a reaction to the text of the gospel will have to be different, too. We will never know how Bach’s performances sounded, much less how he wanted them to sound and why. Chances are it sounded much more like Butt’s version (except not nearly as technically accomplished) than it did like Guttenberg’s. And yet Guttenberg might be closer to Bach than Butt in the way he presents the Matthew Passion.
Of course Bach’s Matthew Passion could just be taken as a piece of music. Indeed, the miracle of Bach’s masterpiece is how great it is, even if we don’t ‘experience’ it. That even the naked music of the Matthew Passion will move us, faithful or faithless. Perhaps not to our every core, but substantially still. But to be moved truly, one needs to partake and understand what Bach says or what Bach gives voice to. Because the Matthew Passion has, in and of itself, meaning. It ought not only be listened to, but experienced, too.
Guttenberg’s interpretation redirects us toward that meaning, but it also profits from knowing the meaning in the first place. A sensitive soul may intuitively get Guttenberg’s musical explanations of the text, but that means that knowing the text is a prerequisite. It is, incidentally, the only prerequisite. Belief is not—because the Passion’s meaning is independent of belief or faith. Neither Guttenberg’s performance nor this review is an attempt to proselytize; merely a call to understanding Bach’s music beyond the notes.
Even if you accept all of this, it need not mean that you have to like the interpretation, musically. After all, the intention, good as it may be, isn’t all-important to the result. But it is important enough—especially in a work like the Matthew Passion—not to be separated. If you don’t separate it, then the Guttenberg recording becomes deserving of our utmost attention and benevolence. And it will, if approached like this, reward generously—through Bach—in ways that musically smoother and less controversial recordings will not.
John Butt’s version is exhilarating on first impression—and exhilarating it remains in many ways. But its flaws (flaws to my ears, at least) become more notable upon repeat listening, and less easy to ignore. Put in the proper context, Gutenberg’s interpretation becomes one of the most intensely felt and thoughtful Matthew Passions. Neither account would be a natural ‘first or only recording recommendation’. But for those who love the work and exploring it in all its facets, both are essential.
![]()
Preceded by a discussion of John Butts Matthew Passion on Tuesday.
Tuesday, 1.13.09, 6:00 am
Two Saint Matthew Passions (John Butt)
Last year, two very remarkable recordings of the Matthew Passion have come across my desk—and remarkable in very different ways. There is the strict one voice per part (OVPP) 1742 “final performing version” Matthew Passion with John Butt and the Dunedin Consort & Players (Linn CKD 313 SACD) and then the “maverick” Matthew Passion of Enoch zu Guttenberg with his Choral Society Neubeuern and KlangVerwaltung Orchestra (Farao 108 035).
John Butt’s is not the first Matthew Passion that uses OVPP—Paul McCreesh has already done that. But it is the first one to use the (ca.)1742 version that Bach presumably used in his last performance of the “big Passion” as Bach always referred to it. On the OVPP question: The sophisticated conjecture about Bach having, or even wanting, just one voice per part in his Matthew Passion can be followed in the writings of Joshua Rifkin. I have not yet read an argument (either pro- or contra-OVPP) that didn’t willfully ignore information suggesting the opposite from their held beliefs, or massage the evidence to necessarily support their side when it might support it possibly at best. I find it curious, though, that Bach should have wanted the big Passion” sung with one voice per part (OVPP), while the St. John Passion’s surviving performing material indicates at least two voices per part.
Ultimately I don’t care—as long as the performance is enjoyable or revealing. The Historically Informed Performance movement has brought us many such performances and should be welcomed by all music lovers with open arms. As long as its ‘extreme fringes’ don’t become the new orthodox, inflexible standard by which to perform Bach (or all baroque music) which would leave some of the greatest music ever written the prerogative of specialist groups, HIP only enriches our musical experience. John Butt notably, laudably states precisely that in his generally incisive liner notes: “Trying to follow Bach’s vocal scoring and the instrumentation of his last performance is not done in the name of a sort of pious literalism that condemns every other approach to the realm of inauthenticity… [H]istorical details might begin to seem rather trivial if the performance reveals this work to provide a musical experience that is almost on the threshold of what is emotionally bearable.” He legitimately hopes that his performance provides that experience, but the ambition is expertly clad in humility.
Upon first listening, the Dunedin Matthew Passion did precisely what John Butt must have set out to achieve. Hugely impressive for its combination of thrust and clarity, the invigorating play of the Dunedin Consort & Players manage to have instrumental and vocal strands appear where all-too often they become part of a greater ‘sound’. This is nouvelle cuisine compared the cuisine classique of decades past or the musical curry that those conductors have made of the Matthew Passion, who performed in the tradition of the massive oratorios. Outstanding, apart from the ever lively playing, are also the superb basses (a sonorous, richly wonderful Jesus in Matthew Brook, Brian Bannatyne-Scott who is simply terrific in “Gerne will ich mich bequemen”, Roderick Bryce who makes Judas rather appealing), and Evangelist Nicholas Mulroy—eminently worth hearing.
Unfortunately, there are also a significant amount of shortcomings that become increasingly obvious with repeat listening. For one, the female voices are less pleasant than the male, notable in the opening “chorus” where they stand out unpleasantly. Particularly unpleasant is alto Clare Wilkinson. Right off the bat the first “kla-a-a-a-a-gen” (note esp. bar 24) is most unfortunate sounding. Soprano I Susan Hamilton is better, but sounds—for better or worse—like a treble most of the time. The interpolating “Wen, Wie, Was, Wohin?” questions from the second choir sound more like pecked interruptions than questions that stipulate the answer of the first choir.
Jesus’ aria “Trinket alle daraus; das ist mein Blut” is fleet, and has the dance-y touch to it that makes this performance so airy, but at the cost of being less touching than it could be. There are also the odd moments of funny accentuation in the Butt recording—for example “Aber nicht wie ich WILL, sondern wie du WILLST” (instead of “Aber nicht wie ICH will, sondern wie DU willst”). But then “Welchen ich kuessen werde, der ists!” is done extremely well—both as regards the pronunciation and the way it is spoken, more than sung. The orchestra and combined voices in “Sind Blitze, sind Donner…” manage for something that is terribly exhilarating, as long as it is not dissected. Here, like in many parts of this performance, the whole becomes much more than the sum of its parts, simply because a few of the parts taken on their own are rather un-lovely. Ironically the Butt-Passion, offering so much focus and detail, moves from “interesting” to splendid only once you take the focus away from it. In that sense, ‘just listening to it’ is a far greater joy than reviewing it, score in hand. If you don’t get stuck quibbling on these various issues (chances are you won’t on hearing it the first few times), the surprising and fresh sweep of the opening carries you with the performance far into part one.
The musical difference of the 1742 version to BWV 244 is insignificant (compared to BWV 244b or some of the different St.John Passion versions). The difference in scoring (harpsichord instead of organ as the basso continuo instrument for the second choir—in any case a change more likely born out of necessity than desire) has been replicated in plenty other recordings, HIP and non-HIP alike. The recording quality and sound of this Linn disc is, as usual with this audiophile label, stupendous.
Monday, 1.5.09, 6:00 am
Happy Anniversary – 2009
2008 ended with three important anniversaries – the 100th of Messiaen (December 10th), the 100th birthday of Elliot Carter (December 11th), and the 150th anniversary of Giacomo Puccini (December 22nd), which I nonchalantly skipped. In 2009 I want to pay a little more attention to anniversaries – and not just the three “big” ones that are Mendelssohn (200 years, February 3rd – and with February specially dedicated to his music on WETA), G.F.Handel (de-composing for 250 years – April 14th), and Joseph Haydn (dead for 200 years – May 31st). With a little diligence, I hope to write a little about these important composers that have anniversaries in 2009:
* Jean Mouton (~1459–1522) most likely born some time 550 years ago
* Henry Purcell (1659–1695) born 350 years ago on March 7th
* Charles Avison (1709–1770) born 300 years ago on February 16th
* Frantisek Benda (1709–1786) born 300 years ago on November 22nd
* Franz V. Krommer (1759–1831) born 250 years ago on November 27th
* Victor Herbert (1859–1924) born 150 years ago on February 1st
* Mikhail Ippolitov-Ivanov (1859–1935) born 150 years ago on November 19th
* Sergei Liapunov (1859–1924) born 150 years ago on November 30th
* Grazyna Bacewicz (1909–1969) born 100 years on February 5th
* Harald Genzmer born 1909, February 9th
* Vagn Holmboe (1909–1996) born 100 years ago on December 20th
* James MacMillan born in 1959 on July 16th
* Erkki Sven Tüür also born in 1959, on October 16th
as well as
* Giuseppe Torelli (1658–1709), died 300 years ago, on February 8th
* Karl Heinrich Graun (1704–1759), died 250 years ago, on August 8th
* Johann Georg Albrechtsberger (1736–1809) died 200 years ago, on March 7th
* Louis Spohr (1784–1859) died 150 years ago, on October 22nd
* Mieczysław Karłowicz (1876–1909) died 100 years ago, on February 8th
* Isaac Albéniz (1860–1909) died 100 years ago, on May 18th
* George Antheil (1900–1959) kicked the bucket 50 years ago, on February 12th
* Eric(h) Zeisl (1905–1959) died 50 years ago, on February 18th
* Ernest Bloch (1880–1959) died 50 years ago, on July 15th
* Bohuslav Martinů (1890–1959) died 50 years ago, on August 28th
* Heitor Villa-Lobos (1887–1959) died 50 years ago, on November 17th









