Saturday, 6.11.11, 8:00 pm
New Releases: CDs
Friedrich Kleinhapl Strikes With Bruch
"New Releases" posts are regular columns that feature reviews of new CDs that are, for one reason or another, truly outstanding among the many I come across every month.

I’d never heard of cellist Friedrich Kleinhapl when a PR blitz accompanied by a release of a recording Beethoven’s first three Cello Sonatas brought him to my attention in late 2009. I approached the affair with my usual skepticism – but before even hearing all of the CD the first time around, I was won over. And not just I. Kleinhapl left a trail of impressed critics on his 2009 Beethoven-sonata tour on the East Coast. Writing in the New York Times, Steve Smith attested that “Purists would have been scandalized. But Mr. Kleinhapl and Mr. Woyke supported their idiosyncratic vision of Beethoven with unimpeachable virtuosity and a thrilling unanimity of spirit.” And the usually measured Celia Porter wrote in the Washington Post that Woyke and Kleinhapl created “scenes of exciting havoc, their performance was driven and unorthodox, leading the audience to the brink of the music’s emotional abyss.” Chicago Sun-Times critic Andrew Patner, responding to a recital broadcast, simply exclaimed “Wow! What an exceptional player”.
The result on CD might not have been as idiosyncratic as the artists seem to have thought, but the performances are certainly superbly played and totally compelling. That verdict is shared among most cellist and critics I know who, without taking away anything away from the cellist’s achievement, all noted that Andreas Woyke’s pianism on the disc was particularly outstanding.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ludwig van Beethoven: Cello Sonata op.69 – Kleinhapl/Woyke (IV. Allegro Vivace, excerpt)
Naturally the first disc of Beethoven Sonatas (Best Recordings 2009, No.5, see also: “Beethoven Unleashed – Cello Sonatas at the Austrian Embassy”) left me wanting to hear the remaining sonatas, too [it wasn’t initially planned as a ‘volume one’ and ‘volume two’ release]. The waiting was over some time last year when Kleinhapl and Woyke released what is de facto volume two – complementing the remaining two sonatas (opp. 102) not, as is virtual industry standard, with Beethoven’s Magic Flute & Handel Variations for Cello and Piano, but with his last Violin Sonata (op.96) transposed for cello. When I spoke to him in January, Kleinhapl told me his reasons for that somewhat unusual choice.
Ars Produktion
Ars Produktion
“As I told you last year, I was always afraid to play Beethoven; I felt at first that I wouldn’t be able to understand Beethoven. But then we tried to find our own way… and I think we found our way [with volume one], and then we started to have a look at the late sonatas and it seemed to be a completely different world than the first three sonatas. I think you can feel in an astonishing, clear way that Beethoven changed his composing style. These two sonatas are at the beginning of his late style and you feel it in an extreme way. And the second theme for us was that we first planned to record the Cello Variations. But then we thought that the music isn’t really that expressive, but rather on the charming and light side, and we decided to transcribe his Tenth Violin Sonata, which is an amazing romantic piece, completely different in style and expression than the two last cello sonatas and so we decided to offer [op.96] as a contrast to the cello sonata. That was, I think, the point when we decided to do that… to do the follow up. It was a long way to come to that decision, actually.
The Violin Sonata was written in a period when LvB was quite happy; he was in love with that unknown ‘immortal beloved’. But in the following months, many different difficulties beset him, and I think you can hear this personal change in the next year, in 1814, starting in late 1813. That year and the following Beethoven started to concentrated more on successful ‘opportunistic’, commercial—but not particularly inspired—music (“Wellington’s Victory” and “Name Day Overture”) and in 1815 he ended up in a personal crisis where he wrote only two important pieces. And those were these two cello sonatas. And with those two pieces he started his late style.
The characters of op.96 and opp.102 couldn’t be more different, but they also let you trace the transition from middle to late style… With the cello sonatas, you’ve got Beethoven’s late style out of the gates. The violin sonata, meanwhile, is not so much representative of his middle style but actually unique in Beethoven’s œvre. It is very melodic, it seems to remind a bit of Schubert, even prefigure Brahms a bit; it’s the most lyric piece I know of Beethoven’s. The cello sonatas, meanwhile, are very rhythmical and extremely condensed. Many themes are only suggested and this change of style cumulates in the fugue in the Fifth Sonata, which was his first big fugue.”
I wonder if the act of transcribing an act of selfishness—because he likes the work and simply wanted to play it or whether there was also a benefit for the listener hearing it on the cello, rather than on the violin. He suggests the latter, understandably, but hedges by emphasizing that it ultimately comes down to personal opinion. The Kreutzer Sonata, for example—though transcribed by Beethoven-student Czerny—he thinks can’t be made to work for the cello at all. (There are other pieces he can also think of not working… but Mahler songs, for example, he loves playing on the cello.)
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ludwig van Beethoven: Cello Sonata op.69 – Kleinhapl/Woyke (III. Scherzo)
I went back to listen to the disc again and again… then and now, but my impression never got much better than it had been on initial sampling: Somewhat inexplicably, ‘volume two’ is a flop to these ears. There’s nothing bad, per se, but none of the performances (except perhaps the pianism in the Adagio of op.102/1) ever takes off, and the transcription of op.96 doesn’t work at any level for me.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Max Bruch: Ave Maria op.61 – Kleinhapl / Kučera / CzRSO (excerpt)
It’s a ungainly affair to write about releases I don’t believe in (unless they’re high-profile failures that are delicious to take down), and I wouldn’t have written even that much (unless prodded), had it not been for another Kleinhapl CD to come across my desk recently; this time without Woyke but an orchestra – bringing together all the bits for Orchestra and Cello by Max Bruch. The result, much like the first Beethoven disc, is superb—and several other of the 15 synonyms my Microsoft Office Thesaurus can provide, too. It’s the high-romantic cello+orchestra equivalent of an ice cream sundae, with topping, two bourbon vanilla scoops, raspberry syrup, sprinkles and nuts, and whipped cream.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Max Bruch: Canzone op.55 – Kleinhapl / Kučera / CzRSO (excerpt)
Bruch is an unabashed melodist and his Kol Nidrei, with which the disc opens, is the epitome of romantic writing for orchestra and cello. Kleinhapl and the Czech Radio Symphony Orchestra under Jan Kučera offer an impassioned, searing performance that can withstand comparison with the very best, including my (historical) favorite, the more regal but less fervent Pierre Fournier.
But Bruch wrote more than Kol Nidrei for cello and orchestra… and where it isn’t the cello Bruch intended (such as in the gorgeous Romance for Viola and Orchestra, op.85), Kleinhapls sets about to transpose again… to a much, much happier result here than in the Beethoven sonata.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Max Bruch: Celtic Adagio op.56 – Kleinhapl / Kučera / CzRSO (excerpt)
The three other—genunine—works for cello and orchestra are the Canzone op.55, the Celtic Adagio op.56, and the Ave Maria op.61, a take-off on a motif from the dramatic cantata “The Cross of Fire” op.52. They’re all about a minute or two shorter than the ten-minute Kol Nidrei; they’re all of Bruch’s easily digestible gorgeousness. To top the disc off (and bring it to over sixty minutes runtime), the Czech RSO performs the Suite for large Orchestra, op.79b, based Russian folk tunes. The performance presents the work as the flowery bouquet of indulgent romanticism. I wrote about it for WETA before [Orchestral Music You Didn’t Know You Love (Max Bruch)]: “In these Russian Suites, [a work] that Bruch orchestrated later for good money and personal pleasure, Bruch works humble wonders of evocative tunes and harmonies; the stuff Howard Shore would probably kill for. (Not that plagiarizing Richard Strauss doesn’t work well enough for him…)”
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Max Bruch: Romance op.85 (transcr.) – Kleinhapl / Kučera / CzRSO (excerpt)
The Orchestra, which I’ve heard elsewhere described as “inexpensive, flexible, excellent”, was recommended to Kleinhapl as ‘well possibly be the best Czech Orchestra at the moment’. The recording certainly doesn’t suggest otherwise and Kleinhapl was astonished by how very easy-going yet energetic the orchestra worked: “It was such a fine experience working with this quite a young orchestra… they have a very positive attitude, are very interested, and seemed not just to do their job, but really be into it.” That’s not fluff, in this case, you can hear it. ![]()
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Max Bruch: Russian Folk Suite op.79b – Kučera / CzRSO (excerpt)
Saturday, 6.4.11, 8:00 pm
Chasing Heidi: Ernst Toch – The Composer and His Chamber Music
A young man harbors the desire to compose, but his father, wishing him to enter the family’s leather trade, won’t hear of it. So the teen buys the scores of Mozart’s String Quartets, secretly studies them under his bed sheets, revels in them, and begins to compose his own conclusions to movements he read half-way through—then comparing his effort’s to the master. The difference between original and attempt is appalling of course, but eventually our aspiring composer—despite being forced to study medicine—masters the craft, wins an important prize and stipend to enroll in a proper conservatory and becomes one of Europe’s foremost composers.
This, or something similar, is the story of Ernst Toch as told by the old Toch himself and repeated by authors and scholars alike. It’s a lovely, touching Cinderella story dotted with semi-quavers. There’s only one snag: It’s not true. Much of this story is made up or at least exaggerated. ‘Biographical facts’, once they make their way into print, are restated as facts without the inverse commas—especially when so little is known about a composer as with Toch who once (allegedly) quipped of being the 20th century’s most-forgotten composer. Recordings are at last appearing with his music (the cpo label is doing all the major lifting, having recorded his complete extant string quartets, symphonies, and some piano music), but their liner notes are sadly unreliable. ‘Facts’ in the authoritative German Music Dictionary MGG can’t necessarily be trusted. (The “four consecutive Austrian State Prizes in Composition” conferred upon Toch, for example, are apparently a mistranslated and continuously recycled outgrowth of some municipal stipends he received while in Vienna.) His grandson’s writings—Lawrence Weschler long wrote for the New Yorker—mean well and give insight, but he, too, works only from hear-say and repeats the myths indistinguishably along the facts. “Riemann’s Encyclopedia of Music”, published by Schott, solves the issue by not including information about Toch from before 1933.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ernst Toch: String Quartet – no.6 – I – Allegro tranquillo | Verdi Quartet, cpo 999 776
Certain is that Toch was born to Jewish immigrants in Vienna on December 7th, 1887. For all we know he did buy those Mozart scores—even though the pocket scores he used back then no longer exist. And his father well probably did want him to take over the family trade just like any discerning father wouldn’t have wanted his son to rely for his future on such a volatile, high-risk—low-yield career path as is composing. But little Ernst got piano lessons at age eight, and by the time he was15 he was already studying harmony at the conservatory with Robert Fuchs. If his father had been a true obstacle, he wasn’t very efficient—and in any case out of the way altogether when he died two years later in 1904. In 1905 a classmate borrowed and showed an early string quartet—No.6, op.12 (the first five are lost)—to Arnold Rosé who performed it with his renowned Rosé Quartet in 1905 in the Vienna Musikverein, which marks the beginning of Toch’s “public career as a composer” (Luitgard Schader). Like the supremely lovely, serene Seventh Quartet that followed afoot, this is unashamedly gorgeous music with a romantic, Brahmsian heart beneath a classical exterior.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ernst Toch: String Quartet - no.7 – I – Allegro piacevole | Buchberger Quartet, cpo 999 775
Ernst Toch did eventually enroll in university in 1907, but apparently not to study medicine as he claimed, but philosophy, art history, and musicology. In 1907 he received the Mozart Prize of the city of Frankfurt (Max Reger was on the jury) which meant moving to Germany to study with Iwan Knorr and Willy Rehberg at the Hoch Conservatory which saw the composition and publication of his Eighth String Quartet (op.18), and Toch at the erstwhile height of his conservative, tonal composing skills. To his First Violin Sonata, op.21 from around that time Toch coyly-confidently referred to as “Brahms’ Fourth”.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ernst Toch: String Quartet - no.8 – II – Lebhaft | Verdi Quartet, cpo 999 686
From Frankfurt he was invited to teach the Mannheim Conservatory in 1913. During that time—during hometown visits—he met and fell in love with Lilly Zwack. The First World War interrupted his teaching career as Toch volunteered to join the Austrian army where he was stationed at the Slovenian-Italian front (one of many parallels to his composing colleague Franz Mittler). His soon-to-be wife Lilly managed to get him a safer post in Vienna, due to Toch’s ‘cultural indispensability’. Marrying that capable girl in 1916 strikes one as a wise decision.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ernst Toch: String Quartet - no.9 – III Adagio | Verdi Quartet, cpo 999 686
Toch went back to Mannheim after the war, but his tone had changed. After composing very little for five years, he premiered his Ninth String Quartet op.26 which received a baffled response from the 1919 Mannheim audience. Modern ears might still find it a quintessentially romantic, even jolly work—certainly no more challenging to the ears than Anton Webern’s Langsamer Satz (1905) and considerably less so than Alban Berg’s Piano Sonata opus 1 (1910)—but by now Toch was very comfortable with dissonance which he continued to explore in his 1920 String Quartet No.10, op.28. The trajectory is there, but listening to either of those works there is no telling that Toch would yet become one of the faces of modern German music, starting with his first participation at the Donaueschingen Chamber Music Days.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ernst Toch: String Quartet - no.10 – III – Katzenhaft schleichend … | Buchberger Quartet, cpo 999 775
During this time he still composed his perfectly tonal Three Burlesques for Piano op.31 which include “The Juggler”. Mildly spiked with wit and dissonance, this could stand in line with some of Shostakovich’s Preludes and not stick out. Especially The Juggler was hugely popular and the score made him more money in royalties than any other. Apparently it was still performed in Nazi Germany—albeit anonymously. In 1926 a critic described its popularity thus: “The secret of the extraordinary effect of the Burlesques lies in their supreme playability… The exceedingly grateful and brilliant third piece [‘The Juggler’] contains pianistic effects of downright Scarlatti-esque simplicity.”
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ernst Toch: Burlesken – op.31 – III – The Juggler | Christian Seibert, cpo 999 926
The dedicatee of his Eleventh and prepenultimate String Quartet (opus 34) was Egon Wellesz, another composer with whom Toch shares many biographical parallels, including the late-career turn towards the symphonic form. The commission came from Paul Hindemith and the work was premiered at premiered at Donaueschingen in 1924.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ernst Toch: String Quartet no.11 – III – Adagio | Buchberger Quartet, cpo 999 687

"Ernst Toch and Paul Hindemith, Contributors to New Musical Departures in Berlin" NYT, August 10th, 1930. (UCLA Library Special Collections)
We think of Hindemith as conservative now, and of Toch not at all, but when Alfred Einstein wrote an article for the Sunday New York Times (August 10th, 1930) about “New Music in Germany”, dashing Toch and the ruddy-faced Hindemith were chosen—literally—as the faces of the movement. They were the superstars of contemporary classical music and Toch an inspiration to the likes of John Cage. Five years later, the young Cage visited Toch who lived in New York at the time, expressing his admiration, in particular for the quasi-Dadaist “Geographical Fugue” to which—so we are told—Toch replied: “You know that was a joke, right?” Perhaps because “The Juggler” and the “Geographical Fugue” were his most popular and enduring pieces, Toch later commented: “It seems that only my musical jokes have taken root.”
“Taking root” is key here, because Toch had plenty of ‘individual’ successes. His works were premiered and performed by the most renowned musicians. Furtwängler and Erich Kleiber conducted works like his “Little Theater Suite” with the Berlin and New York Philharmonic orchestras. As late as 1934 Henry Wood performed Toch’s Symphony for Piano and Orchestra at the Proms. Emmanuel Feuermann premiered his Cello Concerto in 1925 (Otto Klemperer conducted), and already by 1923 Schott Publishers had given him a five year contract (renewed in 1928) that meant financially independence. Toch eventually moved to Berlin and found himself at the epicenter of European modern music.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ernst Toch: Capriccetti – op.36: I. Tender – Thoughtful | Christian Seibert, cpo 999 926
But in 1933 Hitler took power in Germany and the otherwise a-political Toch showed a keen political sensibility. He didn’t return to Germany from the 1933 Maggio Musicale in Florence—representing German music alongside Richard Strauss—but instead headed to Paris where he cabled his wife a pre-arranged code “I’ve got my pencil”. From Paris, the couple eventually moved to California, via London and New York where he was a professor at the “New School for Social Research”, the ‘Exile University’ that employed many recent immigrant-refugees. In 1936 Toch moved to Pacific Palisades, ultimately settling in Santa Monica. In 1940 he became a naturalized citizen. To save his very extended family of sixty, about half who died in the Holocaust (including his sister-in-law), he needed to raise money for which he took on lucrative but unfulfilling movie-music duties. Unlike Korngold, who genially applied himself to the task with great success, Toch never was a top-billed composer. He did get a few Oscar nominations but largely served as a go-to guy for chase scenes, like the memorably absurd sled-chase in Shirley Temple’s 1937 “Heidi”. (YouTube clip here.)
Two chamber works bracket the war years. The 1938 Piano Quintet op.64 (available on a 2008 Naxos recording performed by the Spectrum Concerts Berlin) lingers wistfully on the romantic music of his past communicated through the means of modernism that had brought him fame. From then on—movie music apart—Toch remained silent. In 1943 he wrote a letter to his composition commissioning friend Elizabeth Sprague Coolidge in which he said that “for quite some time I am not in a very happy frame of mind. Disappointments and sorrows render me frustrated and lonesome. I become somehow reluctant to go on writing if my work remains more or less paper in desks and on shelves.” Unfortunately Toch had gotten between the wheels of the pettily rivaling composers’ associations ASCAP and BMI. Toch was presented by the former, but his publishing house owned by the latter, and consequently neither did anything to further Toch’s works for fear of helping the other to any gain.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ernst Toch: Piano Quintet – op.64 – IV – The Dramatic Part | Spectrum Concerts Berlin, Naxos 8.559324
His pre-penultimate String Quartet, the Twelfth, op.70, came in 1946 and marked the end of his writer’s block. “Writing a string quartet was a sublime delight before the world knew the atomic bomb and—in this respect it has not changed—it still is”, he wrote to Mrs. Coolidge again. The opening movement, “Calmly and evenly flowing” is a simple, continuous line with shifting pulse spread though all four instruments. The terse Adagio plays loose with atonality, the third movement, “Pensive Serenade”, is a steadily chugging highlight in 18/16 among all of Toch’s String Quartets. Pizzicato saturated airiness may give way to a dense moment at the center, but at least in the Verdi Quartet’s interpretation (cpo 999 776) this sounds everything but pensive. The immediate eruption of the finale suggests that the fourth movement, “Vigorous”, is more aptly titled and the music veers between sparse solistic phrases and orchestral textures.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ernst Toch: String Quartet - no.12 – III – Pensive Serenade | Verdi Quartet, cpo 999 776
In 1948 Toch was nearly felled by a stroke which led to his resignation from the music department of the University of Southern California (among his students were Vagn Holmboe and André Previn) to focus exclusively on composing and the focus of his compositions would now move to symphonies, of which he composed seven, receiving the 1956 Pulitzer Prize for his Third. Amid this symphonic frenzy and his musical realignment towards tonality falls his last string quartet, a Coleman Chamber Music Association commission from 1953. Theoretically atonal, Bach and Beethoven are recalled as Toch weaves many numerous tone rows into a double fugue, then a triple fugue. Toch sticks to 12-tone rules throughout, and even where he plays academically with tone rows like in the third movement (which he composed and added to the existing movements a few years later), there’s life to this music; the second movement being downright gay and jocular. It’s a far cry from the innocent sweetness of the Sixth Quartet that started his career, but throughout the stylistic changes, Toch remained the same—a musically generous composer—at heart: Something that can be traced through his (published) quartets that span half a century of creative work that deserves more of our attention. ![]()
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Ernst Toch: String Quartet - no.13 – II – Allegro non troppo | Buchberger Quartet, cpo 999 687
A chapter on Toch will likely appear in the upcoming second edition of “Surprised By Beauty”
Tuesday, 5.31.11, 7:00 am
Bernstein via Angers: John Axelrod in Conversation
![]()
![]()
Thursday through Saturday June 2nd, 3rd and 4th (7PM, 1.30PM, and 8PM respectively), John Axelrod will lead the NSO in a performance of Leonard Bernstein’s “Kaddish Symphony”, with text and narration by Samuel Pisar.
Angers is a small and picturesque town to the west of Paris in the Pays de la Loire region with about 160,000 inhabitants, cute (or bountiful) enough to attract ransacking Vikings in the 9th century. In its center rises the impressive Cathedral Saint-Maurice of Angers, begun in Romanesque style a thousand years ago and – after fiery interruptions and setbacks – finished in Gothic garb early in the 13th century.
In it the Orchestre National des Pays de la Loire performed Hector Berlioz’ L’enfance du Christ, some time last month. To be precise, it was the Nantes-division of the bipartite Orchestre National des Pays de la Loire; the Anger division was busy playing film music at an Anger theater that night. Conducting the ONPL was their current music director, Houston-born John Axelrod, “America’s most unknown great conductor”. Or was it “America’s greatest unknown conductor”? That may not be a direct quote, but more or less the gist of his introductory paragraphs when we meet up after the concert, over the comforting fare of a few Belgian beers and pizza. Intriguing… of sorts.
That concert—Delphine Haidan (mezzo), Donat Havar (tenor), Stefano Palatchi (bass), and a familiar voice from his Washington appearances, baritone François LeRoux were the soloists—was impossible to judge after a tiresome trip to Angers via Paris. With four hours of sleep and eight hours of flying and riding through the countryside (I dream of train-travelling bliss by way of combining French high-speed rail tracks with German trains one day… until then the crammed discomfort of the TGV has to suffice), even the best performance of L’enfance du Christ would have been tough to get a proper grip on. At least the weather plays along; bright sunlight chased the gray and its intermittent raindrops scurrying, as an eager, late-to-middle-aged crowd waited to be admitted into the cathedral.
For the Berlioz, beautiful and mildly tedious under the circumstances, Stefano Palatchi used his rich, mono-timbred veteran bass with plenty vibrato, a little less efficiency, and reveled in the many bits that allowed him to show off his lowest register. Mme. Haidan had several shy, wonderful moments while the tenor struggled to stay on pitch with his otherwise pleasant voice. LeRoux’s voice, meanwhile, was not what I remembered it to be; it seemed stripped of its core… a voice singing around the note. That and the part possibly lying too low for him, made resulted in something more akin to Sprechgesang. The trio for two flutes and harps was the highlight it usually is, and the chorus bled beautifully into the pianissimo of the finale concentration was broken when things and/or people bumbled and tumbled about in the back of the reverberant cathedral. The orchestra acquitted itself without fail under Axelrod’s leadership, even if his technique reminded a touch more of Herreweghe than Maazel.
Afterwards, both of us exhausted, we meet for the interview in light of Axelrod’s upcoming performances with the NSO (June 2nd through 4th; see “June in Music”.) Sitting down, with his charming daughter and the Au Pair one table over, I decided not to turn on the voice recorder: For one, the work of transcribing is worse than, say, pulling asparagus. Secondly, conversations tend not to be as good when there is a recorder running because there’s a sense of ‘interviewer-interviewee’ that is not conducive to actual conversation. Thirdly, the temptation to just use the transcribed text is great, but always makes for an ungainly read; uninteresting to all but the most specifically pre-inclined readership.
So what remains of a nearly three hour conversation? Two memories: One of an awkward first impression and an overriding one of one of the better conversations—not just about music—I’ve had in quite a while. But to get to the latter, there was a half hour hurdle to overcome that consisted (seemingly) of PR-advice gone terribly wrong. Let’s pick one example: The phrase“360º artist” might have been thought a clever turn in some secluded image management office, but calling oneself that (or even being called that) is instant credibility-suicide. So is excessive name-dropping, which is almost unfortunate, because in Axelrod’s case he’s got so many genuinely interesting names to drop. (Working in A&R for Atlantic and RCA Records in the late 80s and early 90s, discovering bands that are now household names, chilling with Axel Rose, or then—quite a different track—being a Director for the Robert Mondavi Winery in Costa Mesa, and of course his conducting career that has had him to guest conduct most every great orchestra there is, do all make for awfully interesting conversation. But enduring the first unadulterated wave of it, one wishes for a slightly less ostentatious way to convey it.) Finally there is a very “artiste” red silk scarf; a gratuitous touch that makes even this unapologetic wearer of cravats and pochettes [guilty] roll his eyes—inwardly.
But the Smashing Pumpkins, Leonard Bernstein, 150 conducted orchestras, his buddies Lang Lang and Daniel Hope, and a lachrymose tone of complaint in why his achievements were not better acknowledged back in the United States out of the way, the conversation turns genuine and the cringe-worthy element is finally gone: From Christoph Eschenbach—his teacher in Houston (Axelrod was also his assistant at the 1999 Schleswig Holstein Music Festival)—to Van Halen. About Patricia Kopatchinskaya and Fazil Say and shtick-or-not-shtick. We touch on Thomas Kuhn and life in Angers, where he has made one of his homes—his wife lives in Strasbourg, which causes some (travel-) strain—and became part of the community. About the ONPL—of whose trucks and oversized billboards his contrefait (“that was not my idea!”) beams upon the city—and how it has the fourth largest subscription base among classical orchestras. (Only the two main orchestras in Berlin and the Munich Philharmonic top its roughly 10,000 subscribers.)
Eventually we get around to Axelrod’s performance of the “Symphony No.3 – Kaddish”, the purported reason for the ‘interview’ which is now the sprawling, genial conversation I like it to be. For one, it allows me to be frank about the feelings I harbor for that particular work (as indeed much, though not all of Bernstein’s œuvre). To put it succinctly: That Leonard Bernstein wasn’t struck by lightning after the premiere of the Kaddish Symphony is incontrovertible evidence that G_d doesn’t exist. Or, in case I’m wrong on that, that his mercy and clemency is indeed limitless. The works’ critics are less kind:
I suggest to Mr. Axelrod that the work is stunningly pompous, trite beyond belief; a public ego-trip down “Leonard Bernstein Emotion-Land”. What really sinks the work is the text, which I have called a “pseudo-rebellious, insolent, juvenile and presumptuous way of Bernstein dealing with his troubled adolescence, a dominant father, and his unsettled relationship with the creator”, but I have seen better described as “one of the most embarrassing extravagances of its author’s career; a witches’ brew of maudlin sentimentality, radical chic outrage, and caricature of an honorable Jewish tradition. […Though] Bernstein could write witty light verse, his attempts at serious poetry bled purpler than Barney the Dinosaur.” Professional musicians seem split on the issue: Those who perform it think it has merit; the others seem to agree with the nickname “Symphony No.3 – Rubbish”. Calling it kitsch is still being too nice.
But that’s largely taking issue with the text, a weakness acknowledged even by Bernstein [and not the text that will be performed by Axelrod and the NSO]. Leonard revised and shortened the text in 1977 (the work was premiered in Tel Aviv in December of 1963; its US premiere took place a month later in Boston under Charles Munch, poor sod)… but the atrociousness remained, even in lesser dose. Bernstein’s daughter Jamie wrote a new text that was recorded by Leonard Slatkin in 2003 (Chandos). But her text’s principle achievement lied in not surpassing her father; inserting soft-spoken sentimental recollections of her father in the work, and achingly sincere trendy idioms that don’t sound at all trendy, but smarmy. Dryly commented a conductor familiar with the work: “It seems that the self-indulgent apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.”
The music might be a different matter. Upon hearing my first live performance, I thought it was the usual hodge-podge, from bits of dodecaphony to Broadway tunes, smeared with ambition. Or better phrased by a musician friend: “The tunes are saccharine and childlike (in a bad way) as often happens when Bernstein succumbs to that irresistible desire to write something profound and grand… a lot of people who program it also use it as a vehicle to show the world how close they were to Bernstein. So the self aggrandizement continues once removed.”
Ouch. Axelrod—4165 Facebook friends when I started this article three days ago, and 4208 now—listens to this, variously nodding in the “no”, “yes”, and “kindof” directions… and when he gets a word in, he isn’t perturbed or defensive but, if anything, slightly amused. He launches an eloquent defense of the music itself (to which I’ve come around just a little, since those earlier impressions) and then extols the virtues of the latest text written for the “Kaddish”, the one by international lawyer, Bernstein friend, society-man, and Holocaust survivor Samuel Pisar. (A complete performance of Axelrod conducting the Kaddish Symphony with the Orchestre de Paris in this, now most commonly performed version, is available on YouTube. The soloists – narrator Pisar and soprano Kelley Nassief – are the same as in the upcoming NSO performance.)
Because of Pisar’s biography—read Stephen Brookes very decent piece in the Washington Post on the subject (May 27th)—one of the biggest stumbling blocks of the Kaddish has been removed, which is the preposterous aspect of the text, with high-dramatic anguish and suffering being evoked by someone whose greatest tragedy to date (1963, that is) seems to have been that his daddy didn’t attend his first recital. That, and empathy pain over Kennedy’s death. Having a story of mourning told to one by a survivor of the Holocaust is at an entirely different qualitative level than some speaker reciting Bernstein’s prose. It predisposes one to much more generous listening, because the suffering beneath the Kaddish is now genuine and a reminder of what is truly important in life (or death).
That said, if you are overly sensitive to the desperately politically correct, the hokey, and the preachy (which I tend to suspect behind things most others will cherish for the good intentions), the work still offers some challenges. (The new version’s self-serving prologue still desperately needs cutting, for example.) In any case, the merits of meaning considerably exceed the artistic merits of this version… and one can always focus on the music which less biased re-listening has revealed to be better Bernstein than I had probably given it credit for. Axelrod, in any case, only performs the Kaddish in this version, agreeing that any previous versions were questionable at best. In any case, the resonance of the work suggests he has a better feel for what it does to audience than I would; rather than reacting with embarrassment, audiences jump to their feet at the rousing choral finale, led by the soprano and ending with a flashy orchestral bang. Even at my most cynical, I can’t make myself belief that that’s (just) because they feel compelled by the subject matter or the presence of Samuel Pisar. ![]()
Tuesday, 5.24.11, 6:00 am
Christian Gerhaher, Othmar Schoeck – A Love Story
What does “romantic” in music really mean? It is easy to use to describe music as ‘romantic’, precisely because it is such a broad concept that it is almost never wrong. From Beethoven’s Eroica Symphony via Schumann, Brahms, Wagner, to Richard Strauss and Arnold Schoenberg, “romantic” is the word. Now add an organ symphony by Widor, Chopin Études, a Tchaikovsky opera, a Rachmaninoff concerto… “romantic” all. It’s easy to see the phrase as a cop-out, even when enriched with clarifications like “French-” or “Classical-” or “late-romantic”. But it remains a ubiquitous phrase all the same, because it does have its uses. It’s at the very least a broadly common denominator that reader and the struggling music-journalist share. If the composer died before 1830 and his music is described as romantic we know not to expect some Amadeus-come-lately; if he was born after 1890 we need not fear strict atonality or aleatoric music.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Schoeck: Notturno – 1. Ruhig – Mertens & Minguet Quartet (excerpt)
Describing Othmar Schoeck’s Notturno (1931-33) as romantic is fairly useless in the sense that it won’t prepare one for what the music actually sounds like… it would mislead. But describing the work for string quartet and baritone (a rare combination very likely inspired by Schoenberg’s 1908 String Quartet op.10) as romantic is essential to understanding it. Notturno is the epitome of extreme, late romantic music; the squeezing of chromaticism and the stretching of our common harmonic understanding to, and often beyond, the breaking point.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Schoeck: Notturno – 2. Presto – Gerhaher & Rosamunde Quartet (excerpt)
The difference is similar to describing Webern’s Langsamer Satz as ‘romantic’ (it still, very obviously, is) and the contemporaneous Berg Sonata op.1 as ‘romantic’. (It certainly is, but not at all so obviously.) What makes the difference between perceiving Berg’s op.1 as an early exercise in pantonalism and perceiving it as an achingly beautiful, wistful romantic statement heavy with the airs of Viennese coffee-house atmosphere, is the ability to keep the notes ‘in the air’, in your RAM (Random Access Memory) if you will, and recall them when the notes that give them their proper context finally arrive. It’s chromatic, but with incredibly long, intertwined lines. I can think of no better analogy than a thoroughly constructed, impressive German sentence the length of two paragraphs (think Kant) where, to paraphrase Mark Twain, you won’t know the meaning until the writer, who dives into a sentence, emerges on the other side of his Atlantic with his verb between his teeth.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Schoeck: Notturno – 3. Unruhig & Bewegt – Gerhaher & Rosamunde Quartet (excerpt)
If you hold out for the long elusive ‘verbs’ in Berg’s sonata, they will then fall into place and make harmonic sense where previously there was only dissonance. Now I can gainfully say that Notturno ought to be understood as a romantic work, namely in the sense of Berg’s op.1 or his Lyric Suite. Perhaps you know Schoeck’s Elegie, which might make the Swiss composer seem more like a pocket-sized Richard Strauss; Four-Last-Songs-au-miniature, with a shorter attention span and a sense of very amiable sameness. I like Elegie very much, but Notturno is a different caliber composition in every sense. Notturno pushes boundaries, while Elegie confirms them (from the safe side). Notturno is stern stuff for those expecting more Strauss than Berg, and when Christian Gerhaher and the Rosamunde Quartet performed the work at the Dachau Palace concert series two, three years back, there was a small but steady trickle of audience members who voted against Schoeck (1858-1947, James Joyce’s favorite composer) with their feet.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Schoeck: Notturno – 4. Ruhig & Leise – Mertens & Minguet Quartet (excerpt)
Schoeck would seem to please anyone who is also inclined to the likes of Raff, Rheinberger, Zemlinsky, Reznicek, Schreker, Pfitzner, Marx, Wellesz, Krenek and the like (I’m casting my net deliberately wide)… but Notturno, eight poems by Nikolaus Lenau and a short text by Gottfried Keller in five movements, flirts with the outer, ‘a-tonal’, harmonic reaches from a late-romantic vantage point. It is played with the utmost precision if those long horizontal lines are to be revealed, if the listener is to be able to follow the long, thin strands of music that wind through the score, emerging and submerging – in and out of audibility but with Schoeck’s melodiousness-stretched-to-vanishing always felt. To achieve this effect, the players must not count beats but ‘feel’ their way from phrase to phrase. At least that’s Schoeck’s hyper-romanticism in theory.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Schoeck: Notturno – 5. Rasch & Kräftig (Quasi Recit.) – Gerhaher & Rosamunde Quartet (excerpt)
It isn’t an easy work and the usually excellent, now defunct, Rosamunde Quartet was rather off that night at the Dachau concert, with the first violinist missing much of the potential beauty. But even so, it was obvious what a magnificent piece this is, once one has gotten (to) it. It’s of such fragile and faint beauty; it is so intense despite its thinly woven strands—moments in the fifth movement is as if suspended in mid-air—shimmering of all the colors of tearful yearning. Gerhaher and the quartet took their time in the recording process, and the result is devoid of the flaws the performance was held back by. Gerhaher, in any case, was and is perfect for the role. The dark subject and mood of the poem is right up his alley, and his extraordinarily unaffected voice means that it is only a small, effortless step to the sprechgesang that Notturno demands. That’s a step Gerhaher can go back and forth unnoticed, because he has hit upon artlessness as great art. Whether he is aware of it or not (I reckon the latter), he is unsurpassed at this.
It’s the inclusion of Gerhaher that possibly gives the ECM recording (#2 in WETA’s “Best of 2009“) a marginal edge over the splendid performance of the Minguet Quartet (who seem a bit more at ease with the ‘romantic’ strain in Notturno than the Rosamunde Quartet) with Klaus Mertens on the small and creative NCA (“New Classical Adventure”) label.
When I spoke to Christian Gerhaher on a wet and cold February afternoon in Salzburg in 2009, he had just finished the recording, but wasn’t sure when the disc would be released.”It’s difficult to place and market a recording like that because the work has only a small circle of admirers. But I think it turned out quite well and should be able to enthuse people. But I reckon that [ECM tries] to time it together with some concerts or small tours. Then again, touring with Schoeck is really almost inconceivable – it’s more likely going to be individual concerts here and there.”
Gerhaher, who always seems stern and with a little black, troubling cloud hovering over him, has a somber enthusiasm all of his own, and he warms up – relatively speaking – talking about Notturno: “Schoeck’s music is unbelievably beautiful music, but it’s a difficult mix. All in all it’s late romantic music, but these melodies… melodically it’s a-tonal. Wrapping your ears around it takes a while; I don’t think you can grasp the work upon first hearing. It has immense depth and what is so great about it, looking at the temporal aspect, is how much time these movements get to develop. There’s a similar work of Schoeck’s, Elegie for chamber orchestra and baritone, which is roughly as long, perhaps even longer… but separated in oh-I-don’t-know-how-many movements. Twenty? Twenty-four? [24 is right.] And when you start splitting this comparable music into such small bits, it doesn’t quite manage to come across, I think. Well, I don’t cherish Elegie as much as Notturno at any rate. Notturno is an absolute solitaire – there is no comparable work. There are several lighter, brighter works of Schoeck, too… easily digestible songs, and then a few that dig deeper, too. But not that many… and none so immensely rasping and pricklish as the Notturno.”
Gerhaher continues on the topic, and even where it isn’t technically about Notturno, what he says (and how) is so felt, that one could neither interrupt him, nor now cut the ensuing plea for great art:
“Well, there’s an ‘Italian Songbook’ by Joseph Marx with the same lineup – including baritone – and Resphigi’s Tramonto, but that’s not really for baritone. Then there is Dover Beach of Barber, but those are all small pieces. And in any case, nothing is comparable to the Notturno. I don’t know the Marx yet, but I’m trying to get to know it at some point… perhaps it could be combined in concert with the Schoeck. Then again, that will probably be a futile exercise, too. It is really difficult to find something to build a program around Notturno. We’re now trying to perform it in the first half and then in the second half some Berg and Mahler and Berg again – Seven Early Songs, a few Mahler songs and then the Altenberg Lieder or – that was my idea – Haydn… But that’s pretty experimental, too: first of all to do the Altenberg Songs with piano… and then with a baritone, for which they lie awfully high. You just have to see what works. Maybe Schoenberg’s Book of Hanging Gardens. But that’ll be one of those programs where only a few people will show up, and with even fewer actually enjoying themselves.”
“That’s partly the trouble with all these borderline romantics… think Reger or Pfitzner: when you first lunge at it, there’s a lot of enthusiasm present… but after some scrutiny there remains less substance – for me personally – than one would like there to be left. It ends up not having quite the profundity nor – this something I love so much about the Notturno – this cyclical character. That’s the thing that you don’t find anywhere else. True, great cycles of that sort don’t exist anymore, anyway… Of genuine cycles that have a proper cyclical conception, that can sustain their idea and sustain the tension, there are soooo few around. I can only find a couple. They have to be a little longer than just a quarter hour, of course. I think a true, interesting cycle starts at around 20, 25 minutes. There are the William Blake songs of Britten, of course, which I sing with great enthusiasm, and they’re about fifteen minutes long and great… but that’s just short of the threshold of pain… but that’s precisely what it has to go beyond.
That’s why I think Schoenberg’s Book of Hanging Gardens, about which Adorno said that it intends to seduce one to the cause of new music, is one of the last great, truly great and important cycles. And that’s leaving aside the fact that the love story – or rather: not-love story – it tells is so incredibly fascinating. And Stefan George, who is my far-and-away favorite poet (or at least the poet I can most relate to), depicts it in such a stirring and aptly poignant way. That the homosexual George of all people, surrounded by a largely male – though not necessary homosexual – circle of friends, could fall in love with a woman; a woman who, on top of everything else, found him repulsive… With this unbelievable idea of him having fallen in love with a woman in the first place, George was sort of simultaneously offended and puzzled by himself – and, crowning that, being turned down… that’s one or two levels removed from your average love story. It’s fascinating and unbelievably well depicted in these 15 songs. This parallel story of not being able to sort things out and how in the end it gets infused with true peace: Fascinating indeed!”
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Schoenberg: Das Buch der Hängenden Gärten -J.DeGaetani & G.Kalish – Hain in diesen paradiesen
Second in fascination only to Schoeck’s Notturno, of course. ![]()
Wednesday, 5.18.11, 11:20 am
Fabio Maffei: A Jewel Among Swiss Orchestral Composers
I know my dislike for compilation CDs is irrational—perhaps something to do with filing issues. And yet it barely budges even when faced with occasional beauties. Such as the second volume of Swiss Symphonic Composers on the Gallo label. Aloÿs Fornerod’s (1890-1965) neo-classical “Le Voyage de Printemps” op.28, with vaguely impressionist touches that betray French influences (like his composition teacher—Vincent d’Indy’s), provides thirteen enchanting minutes. His upbeat Second Concerto for Chamber Orchestra op.35, too, has brevity (~15 minutes) and vivacious appeal on its side.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Fabio Maffei: Le Petit Prince (1993-94) – Entry of the Prince
The gay, infectious runs of the closing Mouvement perpétuel give every wind instrument its moment to shine. Jean Balissat’s (1936-2007) short and tangy “Intermezzo for Chamber Orchestra” with its gentle shrieks, violent brass outbreaks, oboe-painted question marks, suspenseful crescendos, and twinkling ending, it’s precisely that: an entertaining Intermezzo leading up to the highlight.
Because what makes this four-composer collection, irreproachably performed by the Orchestra della Svizzera italiana under Emmanuel Siffert, so truly special is the Fabio Maffei’s “Le Petit Prince pour orchestra de chambre”. The work is simply a masterpiece, which is also how the jury at the 1995 Young Composer’s Competition of the Lausanne Chamber Orchestra saw it, giving it their first prize. Ten short ‘pictures’ that accompany the ten chapters of the book of which Maffei says he simply wrote what he felt. Not surprisingly, music that is felt sounds very different from music that is ‘thought’ or ‘constructed’. And the result is a work so unabashedly charming, it is difficult to believe that a 28-year old composer had the guts to write it and not fear being accused of being derivative. He’s not, but that doesn’t mean the music can’t remind of composers we know; anything from Korngold to Messiaen, actually… and plenty gorgeous intimations of the latter. Similarities between the final chapter in Maffei’s Prince, “L’Étoile”, and “Des Canyons Aux Étoiles” exist, but they are not intentional. Asked about the likeness, Maffei said: “Not only didn’t I know that work back then…, I wasn’t even fond of Messiaen’s music at the time. [But I should] point out that more distinctly Messiaenic flavors [can] be found in my more recent works, and that both Messiaen and René Gerber, my composition teacher, studied in Paris in Paul Dukas’ class”. Even had he liked and used Messiaen then, Maffei’s twenty minute orchestral ‘illustration’ sounds inspired, not copied, and it is all I need to know to eagerly keep my ears and eyes wide open for any future instance of Maffei.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Fabio Maffei: Le Petit Prince (1993-94) – The Star (excerpt)
Maffei isn’t the youngest composer given an outing on this sampler: Laurent Mettraux (1970) beats him by a couple years. The more I listen to the latter’s one-movement “Symphonie for Chamber Orchestra No.1”, the more attractive it becomes. The string glissandi (reminding of Gloria Coates), the discordant fanfares, the hulking low growls, the melodic bassoon lines of Wagnerian beauty over an extended pedal point—it all adds up to something thoroughly appealing.
Because of my collecting habits, I would never have picked this disc up myself—what a blessing then that it has been sent to me for review. Such beauties—modest and miraculous alike—I would have loathed to miss. Now I cannot wait to hear more, especially of Maffei. ![]()
Wednesday, 5.11.11, 7:00 am
June in Music

June in Music starts with crossover of the good kind, which is even rarer than any other kind of other good music, because whenever crossover of any two or more kinds of music happens, the result is usually the lowest common denominator of the two. Which is usually very low, indeed. Osvaldo Golijov’s Ayre is crossover of the good kind. While I wasn’t a particular fan of Golijov even when he seemed the next big thing in classical music, some five years ago, Ayre grew on me eventually. After initial, strong reservations, it suddenly wasn’t classical music anymore one night… it had become just music. (Ionarts review here.) That’s the level at which I think the performance of the Mobtown Modern at the Windup Space in Baltimore can be best appreciated. Wednesday, June 1st, 8PM
You can continue right on with Golijov; the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra will perform a “New Work” of his (it actually has a name now; it’s “Sidereus” – a Henry Fogel Consortium commission premiered last year in Memphis), followed by the Britten Chestnut “A Young Person’s Guide to the Orchestra” and then Brahms’ s Piano Concerto No. 1 in b-flat minor, another chestnut by all means… pulled out of the fire, presumably, by Emanuel Ax. Thursday, June 2nd, 8PM, at Strathmore.
![]()
![]()
Thursday through Saturday June 2nd, 3rd and 4th (7PM, 1.30PM, and 8PM respectively), the most successful unknown American conductor (or possibly the most unknown successful American conductor) John Axelrod, of Houston provenance and a friend of the NSO’s Music Director, will lead the NSO in a performance of Leonard Bernstein’s “Kaddish Symphony”, with text and narration by international man of mystery / holocaust survivor / globe-trotting lawyer Samuel Pisar, a friend of the NSO’s Music Director. An interview with John Axelrod, whom I have recently met in Angers where he is the music director of the Orchestre National des Pays de la Loire, will appear on WETA later this month—and in it will contain a discussion of the merits of Bernstein’s work. Agreement, so much for now, was reached at least on this point: Better to hear “Kaddish” with Mr. Pisar’s text, which relates to actual suffering (I hesitate to use the word “meaningful” in the context of one of the most wanton crimes in human history), than Bernstein’s maudlin, juvenile complains about his non-issues. If the “Kaddish” isn’t the main draw for you, perhaps Bernstein’s Symphonic Suite from “On the Waterfront” will do the trick, or Barber’s Agnus Dei, or Aaron Jay Kernis’ “Musica Celestis”. It’s an evening of Americana, tailored in every way to the occasion and the place of performance, the Kennedy Center Concert Hall.
![]()
The music of Lichtenstein’s greatest composer of all time, Josef Gabriel Rheinberger (1839 – 1901), is one of my great loves. I discovered his choral side in boys choir, when we regularly sang his a capella masses in the local cathedral and I discovered his much more chromatic, highly addictive instrumental side. His works for organ and violin and/or orchestra, available either on Capriccio (Suite op.149& Six Pieces / Concertos) or Naxos (Suite op.166 & Six Pieces), make for some of my very favorite recordings; his Nonet (MDG, Consortium Classicum) is one of the finest pieces of chamber music written in its time, and the Sextet (on the same disc) not far behind it. The Fessenden Ensemble will perform exactly some of these hits: the Organ Sonata, Suite op.149, and Sextet (for winds and piano) on Tuesday, June 7th, the Six Pieces op.150 (or at least three of them), the Quartet for piano, oboe, horn, and cello, and the Nonet on Wednesday, June 8th. Both concerts take place at 7.30PM and, being part of the Summer Festival at Thomas Circle, in the National City Christian Church, at 5 Thomas Circle. They are my “Must-Hear Concert of the Month”.
![]()
![]()
There are many wonderful musicians whose careers are not, for lack of a fitting phrase, of the international glamour jet-set type that a rarified handful enjoys. The reasons are manifold, but musicality is often not one of them. Some of them are niche artists, some are perfectly nice but sellable only in specific markets, others genuinely boring but with the right shtick to make them stick around a certain circuit. Friends in the right places and good management can help, too. And a few among them are simply superb, but for some reason have not (yet) gotten the marketing angle right. Miklós Perényi is one such candidate; Grigory Sokolov wasn’t celebrated for years before suddenly being ‘rediscovered’ in his fifties as the insider connoisseur’s pianist; someone like Jenny Linn has a small but dedicated following. Violinist Jennifer Koh is still in the earlier stages of her career, but she also falls into the category of a niche-career artist… the latter, excellent kind, that is. She will perform Augusta Read Thomas’s Third Violin Concerto (“Juggler in Paradise”), a US premiere and NSO Co-Commission. It’s niche stuff (“niche” is not a bad word, it should be added, and (but?) also part of the reason why she Koh is a hit with musical and adventurous audiences. The rest of the program under Christoph Eschenbach is by Robert Schumann; Symphony No.2 and the Overture to “Die Braut von Messina”. The performances take place on Thursday, June 9th (7PM), Friday and Saturday, June 10th and 11th (8PM) at the Kennedy Center.
The fine Austrian Eggner Trio has put together a program of Haydn, Dvořák, and music by Johannes Berauer (jazz, teetering on the brink of the classical… or vice versa) at the Embassy of Austria for Wednesday, June 15th, at 7.30PM.
![]()
![]()
The unofficial Walton Festival continues. After the Philadelphia and the Baltimore Symphony Orchestras bring the Violin Concerto (Charles Dutoit, Gil Shaham, 2oth) and the First Symphony (Carlos Kalmar, 28th) to town late this month, Vladimir Ashkenazy and Stephen Isserlis will perform the Cello Concerto with the NSO – accompanied by Walton’s Portsmouth Point Overture and Shostakovich’s Tenth Symphony. The concerts take place on Thursday, June 16th (7PM), Friday and Saturday, June 17th and 18th (8PM) at the Kennedy Center.
I have not yet managed to hear NOI Philharmonic (of the the UMD School of Music National Orchestral Institute & Festival), but I’ve heard only reliably encouraging things about it. In May one of their concerts stands out in particular, the one with German/New Yorker composer-conductor Matthias Pintscher, one of the most respected composers of his generation. (There is a good 2003 article about him in the Guardian here.) Naturally, the program includes a work by the composer himself, his 2006 “Towards Osiris”. It’s an ambitious program with Beethoven’s and Mahler’s First Symphonies before and after Pintscher’s piece. I wouldn’t got there if I wasn’t at least interested in the Pintscher-piece, but that being the case, I’d definitely go. Saturday, June 18th, at the Clarice Smith Center.
It’s never not a good time for Scarlatti sonatas… so seek out the Phillips Collection who has, in connection with (and amidst) Frank Stella’s Scarlatti-Kirkpatrick Series, Steven Silverman perform select sonatas on the harpsichord for, what the website promised to be a “dual-sensory experience.” I know I wouldn’t mind if all my dual-sensory experiences included at least one part Scarlatti. Thursday, June 30th, 6.30PM. ![]()
Monday, 5.2.11, 6:00 am
I Like This Guy a Lot: Thomas Hampson on Gustav Mahler
May is Mahler Month on WETA, remembering the composer who died on May 18th, one hundred years ago. Mahler is a reoccurring topic in this column and you can find all the Mahler-themed posts at this link and an overview of the WETA Mahler Survey here.
I recently caught up with Thomas Hampson who was on the road, criss-crossing Europe from recital to recital. He sat on the sofa in his hotel suite, with a mix of the debonair and a bit of the down-home, in a boldly checkered shirt (the color somewhere between amaranth and burgundy) and jeans. When you sit across Hampson, with his robust frame, settled deportment, and the level-headed air, nothing he says strikes you mildly hokey, even if it might read like that in print. [See below.] All of it seems well considered, or else wouldn’t have been said. He does strike me as keenly aware—and cautious—of the possible divergence between an impression given in person and how it comes across to a public. He squelches a brief introductory bit of chatter with faint political overtones saying—not at all verbatim, but in essence—that he better shut up, lest he come across as cockalorum who blathers about things he has no business pontificating about. Below are a few excerpts from the conversation that followed.
Mr. Hampson had a recital the night before in Bayreuth at the Stadthalle, Sunday before that in Heidelberg… the following Monday he was going to be at La Scala. Last month he sang songs from George Crumb’s “American Song Book” at the Library of congress. Later this month, May, Hampson will join the New York Philharmonic and Alan Gilbert on tour with an all-Mahler program of the Fifth Symphony and the Kindertotenlieder, which will travel through Basel, (May 12), Baden-Baden (May 13), Vienna (May 15), Berlin (May 19), Dresden (May 21), and Leipzig (May 23). Hampson will follow that up with more Mahler recitals throughout Europe for the rest of the summer.
When I spoke to him, he had come to town for a recital of Mahler’s Des Knaben Wunderhorn. Is it Mahler for him everywhere this season?
No, not just Mahler. In Heidelberg it was Schubert Heine songs, for example. But there is always some Mahler on the programs. Sometimes it’s a mixture of Liszt and Mahler. Only tomorrow is it pure Mahler, because Munich loves pure Mahler and I’m apparently known for Mahler here… which I’m doing a lot this year. It was a big winter season of Mahler concerts in sort of every mutation of piano versions and orchestra versions you can imagine. It’s fun. No opera, for six months! Just concerts, he says, and rubs his hands together with contentment.
Does that feel good not to sing opera? Yes, it feels real good. You feel like a musician.
He chuckles, which gives me time to insert the question: “Are you a musician or a singer?” To which his immediate response is hearty, jovial laugh with an edge:
I don’t know, Should I hit you first and then answer?
It’s the old joke, isn’t it? It’s a bad rap for singers, it’s an unfair rap, it’s a stupid rap… But it’s very interesting… I very much consider myself a musician who is a singer. For me to say that I’m a singer, however, does not feel like that means I’m not a musician. So I don’t know really… go with that however you’d like. You can’t be a singer and not be a musician. You could be a musician and not be a singer. It’s like saying: are you an oboist or are you a musician? Are you a violinist or are you a musician? Somehow there is a feeling that if you are a singer that you are conveying something that is extra-musical or that your life is conveying things that are non-musical at the same time, but in fact what we seeing the language we recreate is a musical language. And the musical studies of a singer admittedly can be – don’t have to be but can be – different from a non-singing musician. But it’s the bedrock of what we all do is music.
I’m a little surprised by the answer and wonder if the question has different connotations for singers than it would have for a violinist. My intention is the same insidious intention in either case, the implication being of course—which is why he would have rightly hit me over the head—that a violinist or the just-singer focuses on his subject at the exclusion of music at large. I ask him with genuine incredulity if he had never met singers that were in fact not musicians.
But perhaps Hampson hasn’t warmed up to cheekiness yet, because we get stuck in technicalities on whether one could be a professional singer and not read music and whether one could be a musician without actually being musically trained. And about the difference in jargon between instrumentalists and singers…. like the fact that he might not have an immediate association with the “c-minor trio” of Mozart:
That sort of term doesn’t jazz my bell. I don’t know. If I heard the music, I might go: oh, yes, that one. Oh, yes, that is c-minor. But I just don’t know that nomenclature. Oh, please meet my wife.
It’s a welcome interruption to start down a different path. While his wife and company go down to wait at the bar—Hampson assures them to get done with me quick so he can join them in a bit—I throw something completely different at him:
Do you love Bruckner?
Huh? Do I love what? Bruckner? I do. I do. I love his music, he says, taken a little aback at the question rapidly fired at him as soon as his wife leaves the hotel room. Why do you ask that?
It was a follow up, I say with impertinent tenaciousness… because a just-singer wouldn’t have a lot to do with it, since there’s awfully little to sing in it…
Yes, not a lot to sing in it. But, I’m crazy about Bruckner. I’m crazy about different interpretations of Bruckner. I can’t profess to know a lot of it. If I was going to be a conductor it probably wouldn’t be on my top five list of things to go after… But what I love about Bruckner is the new world about Bruckner-thought that just completely links him, you know… almost shoulder-to-shoulder with Schubert. I think that has been very enlightening. Bruckner used to be a sort of obscure musician’s musician’s kind of music; and with monstrous sounds and so forth. And I think that, starting with Harnoncourt I suppose, though Harnoncourt has taken it to the nth degree… but the last of the great Brucknerians that just had this enormous landscape—I’m thinking of Haitink recordings of Bruckner that are just unbelievable, and then I heard Haitink talk about Bruckner and he talked about Schubert and… hmm, wait… I guess I take all that back…
“Nevermind,” he says with a sort of… adorable, actually, coy shrug. But at least now he likes the questions. “These are easy,” he says about them, “this is great.”
I posit: <Bruckner is a love, Mahler an addiction>
For you? For me? It’s a clever turn, at least. Why not. But Mahler doesn’t register like that anymore, for me. Mahler is kind of a center signpost in my life and my orientation to music, music history… I’ve learned a lot about myself through Mahler’s music, Mahler’s searching for philosophies, questioning, his existential questions, metaphysical questions… are, if you will, rabbit holes that you can go through… I believe Mahler to have essentially ended his life and having his impact as a kind of philosopher, if not outright mystic, himself. And I think trying to define the most influential philosophy in Mahler – ergo: that’s where he’s really to be answered – is a mistake. I think: Yes, he’s Nietzschean. Yes, he’s Schopenhauerean. And yes he’s a natural philosopher, and yes he’s a Christian Mystic and Yes-es, yes-es, yes-es. And all of it boils down to an essential concept of ‘Love is God, God is Love, Life is Love is God’ and it never stops. Take your time, do it right, do it as faithfully as everything you know to be truth and move into the vibrations that’s yours to come. The soul is, for Gustav Mahler, immortal.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Gustav Mahler, “Des Antonius von Padua Fischpredigt” (excerpt). Thomas Hampson & Wiener Virtuosen, 477 9289
And that’s kind of kind of interesting. I don’t think it’s reincarnation, for Mahler. I think it’s just this transcendence of life; it’s more about the responsibility of we who are here. We have our jokes about Mahler talking to plants and not killing flies, but that taken rather more inverted; a panentheism that says that every manifestation of life is a essentially an extension of whatever God is. So rather than God being in nature, in fact it’s the other way around. That everything is a manifestation of the God-force. And this life-force, that any particular living entity inhabits, is eternity. And that the responsibility, respect, and embracing of that—especially form human beings, where the common denominator is Love—in the big Agápe, even Philia sense of love—that’s where I find Mahler sort of settling down. And a lot of metaphors of love and song and life are in his songs. Always sort of moving around… it’s very Walt Whitmanish, really… “Song of Myself” and such… I like this guy a lot. It’s more than an addiction for me.
Sounds much more like a love than an addiction…
Yes. But I look for this level of thought in all the composers and poets. Singing repertoire is very often in these kinds of worlds. It’s not just all sort of… in fact, none of it is, or should be just about: ‘what can I learn that makes me look good or displays my prowess…’ I don’t think that singing is a spectator-activity. We as singers and artists are there to make audible the collective thoughts in whatever symbols and manifestations they come up and from whatever language… about the story of us. People. it’s always about people, and I’m the one that’s supposed to make it audible. I think in any recital, the sooner I can become that doorway that just flapped open, to any particular person’s imagination, at whatever level they’re meeting me in the Schubert-Heine world, or Liszt-Heine, or Lizst-Goethe, or Des Knaben Wunderhorn, or American Songs… whatever that world is that they’re going to, it’s about them. It’s about your reaction to that stuff that I’m singing. I don’t think it’s about a presentation of Tom Hampson and how he can sing. That just doesn’t register with me. And I think the theater is the same way. I think opera is exactly the same way. The energy in an opera house or a concert hall is from the concert hall to the stage. It’s about being at the disposal of what you do.
Now, how well you do that, in what context you do that, and what physical attributes you have, of course you become identified with your own performances. It’s stupid not to be. It’s not some sort of false humility. But if you, as an audience member, are not in the world of Simon Boccanegra quickly, I haven’t done my job right. It’s the same way in a recital. A lot of programming for recitals is about unraveling that process for people. And it’s different in different cultures. It’s different in different contexts, different cities. I like to program pretty specifically. I want to know what kind of people are coming, what kind of program they are used to hearing, and what they aren’t… Very often now, presenters really only want you to just sing things they know will be popular with their public. So if I know you’ve got sort of a middle aged public that adores Schubert, yeah, let’s do Schubert. But I got news for you. If you love Schubert, you’re gonna loooove Mahler.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Gustav Mahler, “Urlicht” (excerpt). Thomas Hampson & Wiener Virtuosen, 477 9289
Earlier this year Deutsche Grammophon released Hampson’s recording of Des Knaben Wunderhorn with the Wiener Virtuosen, a conductor-less ensemble comprised of principal players of the Vienna Philharmonic, that is roughly the size of the orchestra that these songs would have originally been performed with. [YouTube Video from DG of Hampson on the project here.]
As Charles Downey pointed out reviewing Hampson’s Mahler disc of orchestral songs (Michael Tilson Thomas, SFS Media), “…Hampson tends to luxuriate in his sound too much, and his German pronunciation suffers in comparison with [Christian] Gerhaher.” But then anyone’s German would look sketchy when compared to Gerhaher’s native unaffected perfection… and Hampson’s sung German sounds much like his spoken German: very, very good, just not quite idiomatic. Much more to the point: the singing is wonderful, with a right mix of genteel and grit… never ostentatious, executed with warmth and flexibility. And the accompaniment is as sensitive, detailed, and transparent as any I have heard. That alone would be a worthy reason to add this disc to one’s Mahler collection, however bulging it already it is. ![]()
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Gustav Mahler, “Der Tamboursg’sell” (excerpt). Thomas Hampson & Wiener Virtuosen, 477 9289
Sunday, 4.24.11, 12:00 pm
New Releases: CDs
Vocal CD Pick of the Week: Diana Damrau’s Strauss Sublime
"New Releases" posts are regular columns that feature reviews of new CDs that are, for one reason or another, truly outstanding among the many I come across every month.
Virgin Classics
There are different kinds of “gorgeous”, “pretty”, “exciting”, and “ravishing” in music. Really obvious ones—like the Larghetto from Mozart’s Clarinet Quintet—where it is hard to imagine someone from an even remotely similar cultural background not to share some of the delight on first hearing. Then there are really difficult ones, pieces of music that usually demand repeat exposure, willingness, and a little background to come to experience sensual bliss. No matter how much you love Bartók string quartets, it would take a considerable arrogance or small-mindedness to suggest that it is easy music to love, much less lovable upon first exposure.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Mozart, Clarinet Quintet KV.581, Larghetto. Quatuor Stadler & J.C.Veihan, K617
In that sense the best of Richard Strauss is difficult music to handle, because if you love it, it is so seductive, it suggests that loving it is the most natural thing in the world. That listening to the Four Last Songs, for example, should make any and every random or accidental listener fall in love instantly, too. I know this isn’t true, but I would like to think that there is a kind of gorgeousness about the orchestral songs of Richard Strauss that makes the road to sensual enjoyment a fairly easy and fast one to travel. And no one could possibly make it any easier than Diana Damrau, that supreme Strauss soprano… a voice – and indeed a woman – that immediately makes one feel that Strauss composed for her, and only for her.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
B.Bartók, String Quartet No.5, SZ102, Finale. Hagen Quartet. Newton Classics 8802011
Her playfulness, her ease, her joyfully purled high notes, her melodious allure and the coy sparkle: Whether in opera or concert, she is a perfect joy to experience… capable of making believers out of doubters and turning hackneyed roles into three dimensional, intriguing characters. If you haven’t the opportunity to hear her live, the proof is in her latest pudding CD release on Virgin Classics. Strauss’ finest orchestral songs, recorded with the best Strauss-team available at the time: Christian Thielemann and the Munich Philharmonic, an orchestra capable of world class performances if (and only if) prodded in the right ways. The loving, caring sensitivity of Thielemann’s support (! – no orchestral ego here at all) is oozing through the music everywhere; he accompanies in the best sense: eager to let Damrau and Strauss shine in the best possible light.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
R.Strauss, Ständchen Op.17/2. Diana Damrau. Virgin Classics 628664
Sixteen of the 22 songs on this disc were recorded live at a concert at the Munich Philharmonic Hall that I happened to catch (reviewed in a column for WETA here). The rest was recorded later (the liner notes won’t tell and the sound doesn’t give it away) to give the CD a more generous play time and help a few more Strauss gems to this luxuriant treatment. As predicted immediately after the concert: the resultant disc goes immediately to my Want-List; as it would have to do for everyone who likes Strauss.
The disc is the current Vocal CD Pick of the Week (VivaLaVoce) and songs of it are played on VivaLaVoce throughout the day, every day this week. ![]()
Monday, 4.18.11, 6:00 am
Musical Excursions: São Paulo

São Paulo is far, far away from anywhere else in the classical music world. Not only because it 4750 miles away from Washington D.C. – further than most of Europe, actually – but because of its relative isolation. For an artist, it’s easy to pop by Baltimore and New York if you are already in Philadelphia anyway. Or Bergen or Memmingen, if you had a concert in Aberdeen or Göteborg. The same is not true for Brazil: Musicians will come to São Paulo only if São Paulo is what they came for, and it will most likely be the only stop on that itinerary. That makes it cumbersome and expensive to get to, and it might partly explain why we hear so little about classical music from that part of the world. And that despite a fabulous orchestra down there, the Orquestra Sinfônica do Estado de São Paulo. Previously known only to a few insiders or those who enjoyed the orchestra’s CDs on the BIS label, Marin Alsop’s appointment as the new Music Director of the orchestra might put it more squarely on our cultural map. I got to visit the orchestra last October; this is the travelogue.
I arrive in São Paulo after about eleven hours on a plane—a haul that will invariably leave you grumpy, no matter how much P.G. Wodehouse you wisely packed for the trip. The driver picks me up and steers us through what must be the singularly ugliest city I have ever laid my eyes on. Like a shanty-town version of LA, except twice the size. As you drive from the airport to the city, you pass three prisons, big, gray, forbidding, threatening with their grimy towers, and—true to their function—appropriately dispiriting-looking; two on the left for men, one on the right for women.
A ‘river’ snakes through whatever part of town I’m in, although the poor thing doesn’t really deserve the name, its color the hue of ripe eggplant and more white foam on it than a Johnson & Johnson bubble bath. Trash and solid concrete banks to either side, soot and graffiti. Image-google “Rio Tietê” and you get the idea. Welcome to São Paulo!
Even moments of surprising urban flair—a sudden hint of Paris beneath a cast iron pedestrian bridge and a tree in its full lilac bloom of spring—are surrounded by gloomy béton brut and filth. A photographer friend who has lived in São Paulo for many years and loves the city dearly puts her relationship with the town bluntly: “São Paulo is like an ugly woman, and like every ugly woman, she’s great in bed.” Intriguing postulation, but I was here to check out the Orquestra Sinfônica do Estado de São Paulo (OSESP), about to embark on a European tour with its new, three-year interim music director Yan Pascal Tortelier.
The OSESP is unique in South America for its financial situation, professional organization, and quality. It is by far the finest orchestra in South America (though every member has no qualms admitting that that itself doesn’t mean much); certainly one of the top orchestras in the southern hemisphere. This quality is easily attestable by the many fine recordings on BIS; whether it is Bernstein, Respighi, Lindberg or ‘home-field advantage composers’ like Villa-Lobos, Carmago Guarnieri, and Claudio Santoro, the quality impresses. My recommendation would be Tchaikovsky’s and Medtner’s First Piano Concertos with Yevgeny Sudbin, though—modern reference recordings for either work.
The conductor on all these recordings is then-Artistic Director and OSESP strongman John Neschling who—although persona non grata now—is the person directly responsible for just about everything that makes the OSESP what it is today. His determination and single-mindedness, his vision brought the OSESP from an above-average provincial band to an international contender. A mean old fashioned Kapellmeister, he was the orchestra’s drill master. With his political savvy (until recently, at least), he managed to position the orchestra in its financially enviable situation, now a 360 employees strong organization. And perhaps most importantly, it was his initiative and connections that got the orchestra its permanent home, the “Sala São Paulo”.
After running afoul of influential politicians and alienating many orchestra members with his all-too-dictatorial style and hubris, Neschling was fired two years ago. But the Sala São Paulo remains; a structure borne from the converted downtown “Júlio Prestes” train station in the French Colonial style, amid a despondent area referred to as “Cracolândia”. The building houses the administration in considerable splendor. In the middle, a former winter garden, is the actual concert hall—the centerpiece of the construction. A shoe box in the style of Boston Symphony Hall or the Concertgebouw, surrounded by 32 Corinthian pillars, but with a kicker: an adjustable ceiling. From the roof above the ceiling hang fifteen individually controllable wooden ceiling segments, each about eight tons heavy. Between their highest position at nearly 80 feet up to lowering them just above the first level of balconies, the volume of the hall can be adjusted to anywhere between a million and 400.000 cubic feet. That allows a choice of natural reverb between one and seven seconds; suitable for anything from a Ravel Piano Trio to Mahler’s Eighth. Many profiles for particular works are already tried-out and programmed into the system, so that a conductor can get a ceiling profile for, say, Shostakovich’s Fourth at the push of a button. One could get lost in the possibilities the hall offers—in part because it’s not just a neat toy but a considerable acoustic experience. The rehearsals and concerts I heard may not have shown the orchestra from its chocolate side, but the hall distinguished itself splendidly.
But what is a hall, if the orchestra isn’t in shape? Like salmon that move from rivers into the sea and suffer disorientation from the osmotic shock, the orchestra still doesn’t seem to have adjusted fully to the very different style that a conductor like Yan Pascal Tortelier, reared on Anglo-orchestras, presents. Because Tortelier was willing to step in at extremely short notice to save the 2009 season of the OSESP, gratitude ran high and he was offered a two-year extension of his contract which now expires after next season. The more relaxed atmosphere in rehearsals seemed to make for more conducive working conditions and Antonio Meneses, who was performing with the OSESP while I was there (for the first time in the post-Neschling era) suggested that unlike in the past, he now saw musicians smiling during rehearsals.
But it isn’t all smiles for those involved. Working with orchestras like the BBC Philharmonic and the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra, Tortelier expects the music ready before he starts rehearsals; shaping a reasonably ready product into the interpretive directions of his choice: Arrive-correct-conduct-concertize-depart. The orchestra for the most part expects to go through the basics with their conductor; to build a piece block by block. They are used to be taken by the hand and they are, of course, used to someone whose vision—obsession even—drives the orchestra. A long conversation with Tortelier made very clear how seriously he takes his job and how much he is in it with his heart. But he’s not the type, nor in the position, for visions—and if he had one, he’d probably check himself into a hospital.
Although Neschling had admittedly become untenable, the newfound freedoms (and decreasing rehearsal time) leave musicians in a situation that brings to my mind the title from Erich Fromm’s famous book: “Escape from Freedom”. The resulting misunderstandings can be frustrating for chief conductor (but not music/artistic director—a position purposely split after the Neschling-experience) and orchestra alike.
“I just want to make music, not politics” Tortelier told me, and hitting upon resistances that are outside of his realm of responsibility gets under his skin even more than when he has to work around unexpected technical issues in preparing the scores. Amid these less-than-ideal circumstances—acknowledged by all except the administration—Tortelier doggedly focuses on what is important to him: The European tour and a recording for Chandos with the orchestra of the music of Florent Schmitt. His earnest struggle and very charming and disarming honesty makes it impossible to take sides in this musico-marital mismatch.
I attended two of the last concerts before the orchestra would start their tour in Dubrovnik, and they went some way to exemplify the tricky situation. Playing Villa Lobos’ Choros No.6, Ravel’s La Valse, Shostakovich’s Cello Concerto and Antônio Carlos Gomes’ Lo Schiavo Overture, you could hear the enormous potential and energy and the orchestra’s rich, sonorous ‘Old Europe’ sound. But you had to look for it. The dress rehearsal had already been a de-facto working rehearsal and the first performance sounded more like a modest dress rehearsal. The second concert was a considerable improvement and allowed to imagine that a few concerts (literally) down the road the OSESP could reach the level necessary to deeply impress audiences in Frankfurt or Cologne—a level they aspire to.
Much depends on Marin Alsop now, who will succeed Tortelier. Her tenure hasn’t the most auspicious circumstances surrounding it, partly because she was clearly not the first choice of the administration, partly because she was (allegedly) installed without fully consulting the players. Kristjan Järvi was apparently ready to take on the challenge but only in the position of a “General Music Director”, combining musical and artistic direction again. With the administration unwilling to give up its recently attained powers, that did not pan out. A similarly big (and qualified) name wasn’t easily lured to a place so far in any direction from other musical hotspots as São Paulo… among those who turned the job down are Osmo Vänskä and Michael Tilson-Thomas. Alsop isn’t quite the stern-but-patient orchestra builder, the kind of old-school Kapellmeister that a good part of the orchestra desires and needs… but she comes reasonably close… closer than Tortelier at least. And she is a much more media-savvy, media-friendly item than the charming but edgy Frenchman. Starting with controversy and claims of lack of consultation with the players isn’t a new situation for her, and she’s turned that situation around with diligence, hard work, and commitment… the rest will be decided by how quickly she can bring the players around to all pull into the same direction. ![]()































